Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Trump on the 'candidates' for Iran's leader — what it means for regional security and for Ukraine

The US president said he has several potential "good leaders" for Iran and is reportedly acting to ensure they survive during an operation. This is not just rhetoric — such statements change the risks of escalation in the Middle East and have direct consequences for global markets and security, including Ukraine's interests.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 6, 2026 · 2 min read

Trump on the 'candidates' for Iran's leader — what it means for regional security and for Ukraine
Дональд Трамп (Фото: EPA)

What happened

In an interview with NBC News, Donald Trump said he wants to achieve a "cleansing" of Iran's leadership structure and has several people who, in his view, could become a "good leader." He added that the US is "taking steps" to keep those people alive during the military operation.

"We want to go in and clean it all out. We don't need someone who will be rebuilding everything over 10 years"

— Donald Trump, President of the United States (NBC News interview)

What the media report — and the questions this raises

According to ABC News journalist Jonathan Karl, who cites a conversation with the president, several people the US had considered as possible successors were reportedly killed during strikes on February 28. These reports are significant, but in many cases require additional verification by independent sources.

Axios reported strikes on the council that would elect the next Supreme Leader of Iran. If confirmed, such information would indicate attempts to influence not only infrastructure but also the political vertical — which increases the risk of unpredictable consequences.

Why it matters — concise and to the point

First, public statements about a list of "candidates" to replace leadership are not just internal rhetoric: they change the behavior of actors in the region and increase the likelihood of escalation.

Second, strikes on structures related to the selection of a leader turn succession politics into an element of military strategy — which complicates diplomatic de-escalation scenarios.

Impact on Ukraine and global interests

Escalation in the Middle East has several channels of impact on Ukraine's interests: from energy and food prices to diplomatic attention and weapons supplies. Analysts note that prolonged instability can distract partners, slow deliveries of critical systems, and create new lines of political competition among allies.

What to expect next

While official statements and media reports intersect, it is important to set aside emotions and assess the facts. Partners need to consolidate information, and Ukraine should emphasize protecting its own interests in dialogue with allies: from energy security to ensuring the resilience of agricultural exports.

Experts warn that such operations often have unpredictable consequences, and the real risks of escalation will become clearer in the coming weeks. Now the ball is in the partners' court — will declarations turn into concrete measures that reduce risks for the region and for Ukraine?

  • February 28: reports of strikes that damaged facilities linked to Iran's top leadership (according to open sources).
  • March 2: ABC News — Jonathan Karl reported the deaths of some people the US had considered possible candidates (requires independent verification).
  • March 3: Axios reported a strike on the council that could have been choosing the next Supreme Leader (additional verification as needed).

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026