Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Trump urged Australia not to deport Iranian women footballers — their lives at risk and international pressure

A post by Donald Trump and reactions from human rights activists have raised questions about the safety and legal status of Iranian sportswomen in Australia. Why this matters and what steps could protect the players — we lay out the facts.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Trump urged Australia not to deport Iranian women footballers — their lives at risk and international pressure
Дональд Трамп (Фото: Yuri Gripas/EPA)

While attention is focused on the headlines — human life is at the center

Donald Trump, in a post on Truth Social, urged Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese not to deport the Iranian women's national football team, asserting that returning to Iran poses a threat to the athletes' lives. The public appeal added international pressure around an incident that began when part of the team refused to perform the national anthem during one of the matches at the Asian Cup.

What happened (facts)

According to Reuters and CNN: during the tournament part of the Iranian players stood silently while the anthem was performed. In subsequent matches the team's composition behaved differently — some performed the anthem, others gave a military salute. After one match several players left the hotel and are currently, according to CNN, under police protection in Australia.

Iran's state broadcaster and presenters on state TV reacted harshly, calling the players "traitors"; such rhetoric creates a real risk of persecution after a possible return. FIFA told CNN that it is in contact with organizers and interested parties.

"Australia is making a terrible humanitarian mistake by allowing the Iranian women's national football team to be forcibly returned to Iran, where they will most likely be killed"

— Donald Trump, politician (post on Truth Social)

Reactions and risks

Human rights activists and diaspora leaders emphasize: public accusations of treason on state TV during wartime can mean criminal and extrajudicial consequences for the athletes if they return. Hadi Karimi from the Iranian community in Australia reports cases in which players made international gestures for help during the incident, and part of the team sought protection.

"No group of athletes should be effectively held hostage by their own member federation and deprived of access to external support networks"

— Craig Foster, former Australian national team player and human rights advocate

"I call on the Australian government to ensure their safety and provide any necessary support"

— Reza Pahlavi, public figure (son of the Shah of Iran)

Context and possible scenarios

Key point: the issue is not only about sporting discipline, but about the right to life, liberty and political expression. The actors involved — Australian law enforcement, football institutions (FIFA/AFC), diaspora representatives and international human rights organizations — can influence the outcome. Possible actions include providing temporary protection in Australia, coordinating with third countries for relocation, or intervention by international federations to guarantee the athletes' safety.

For Ukraine this story is a reminder that questions of security and the right to political expression have international resonance: the reactions of governments and federations affect not only reputations but people's real lives.

What next?

For now it is important to monitor official decisions by Australian authorities and statements from FIFA/AFC. International pressure and public appeals, such as Donald Trump's post, raise attention to the case — but the final resolution will depend on legal steps and practical decisions on the ground. Whether countries and football institutions will turn that attention into concrete protection is the key question in the coming days.

"There is hope that other players will join those who are now safe — for some, this is already amazing news"

— Hadi Karimi, human rights activist and member of the Iranian community

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026