Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Trump told Zelensky he discussed 20 points of a peace plan with Putin — what it means for Ukraine's security

Before the December 28 meeting, Donald Trump told Volodymyr Zelensky that he had discussed every point of the peace plan with Putin. We examine why words must turn into guarantees, not declarations.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 29, 2025 · 2 min read

Trump told Zelensky he discussed 20 points of a peace plan with Putin — what it means for Ukraine's security

In brief

According to President Volodymyr Zelensky, before their meeting on 28 December Donald Trump told him by phone that he had "a long conversation with Putin" and had "gone through all 20 points of the peace plan point by point." The meeting between Trump and Zelensky lasted more than two hours; after it there were phone calls with European leaders. No concrete decisions have been made yet — the diplomatic process continues.

What Zelensky said

"President Trump told me that there was a long conversation with Putin, he went through all 20 points of the plan. Point by point. And I thanked him for that. It is important — that we all are in the same context, and that they discuss this document specifically, and not some other documents"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, president of Ukraine

"But I told the president [Trump] that for us it is very important… This is not the first time when Putin says one thing and does another. For us it is very important that words match actions"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, president of Ukraine

Position: why this matters

The phrase about the "20 points having been discussed" is not just diplomatic ritual. For Ukraine, the key issue is not so much what was said on the phone as how those words are transformed into security mechanisms: verification, guarantees, phased steps, and monitoring compliance with agreements. The risk for us is when declarations are not backed up by actions, but the very fact that the document is being discussed at the highest level opens political space for further negotiations and international pressure.

Key facts

  • On 28 December Trump and Zelensky held a closed-door meeting with an expanded delegation; it lasted more than two hours.
  • After the meeting there were phone conversations with European leaders.
  • According to Zelensky, Trump said by phone that he discussed the "20 points" of a peace plan with Putin; the Ukrainian president did not disclose details of the conversation.
  • No concrete decisions were recorded at the meeting — the diplomatic process is ongoing.

Analysis

Diplomatic contacts between the leaders of major countries always serve two purposes: reducing tensions and creating the political conditions for practical steps. Experts note that an exchange of positions alone is not yet a security guarantee. Ukraine needs to push for three things: 1) clear timelines for implementing the points, 2) verification mechanisms (independent observers, monitoring), 3) sanctions or other real consequences in case of non‑compliance. Without these, "going through the points" risks remaining at the level of declarations.

Conclusion

The fact of the conversation is a signal: the peace-plan issue is on the radar of international players. The next step for Ukraine and its partners is to turn words into concrete guarantees and control mechanisms. Whether the "20 points" become a document that protects our interests, or merely a diplomatic basis for further talks, depends on how quickly and firmly partners move from words to action.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026