Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Trumpism as an ersatz ideology and a simulation of political doctrine

Why are so many thoughtful people around the world today trying to understand the nature and causes of the rise of Trumpism? Perhaps because there is already a clear understanding—or, if not understanding, then at least a feeling—that this will not end well.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 12, 2025 · 2 min read

Trumpism as an ersatz ideology and a simulation of political doctrine

What is Trumpism and is it an ideology

This is how the political ideology of Trump and his “hard-core” supporters began to be called already during his first presidential campaign. After his coming to power, and especially in a second term, this ideology materialized into significant changes in the practice of government, in domestic and foreign policy, and even in the “Pshonka-style” decoration of the Oval Office.

We remember that totalitarian ideologies of the past (national socialism, Marxism–Leninism, Maoism), when they became the basis of state policy, also began to influence everything they could reach — including things seemingly far removed from politics, such as aesthetics, culture, art, and architecture.

But is Trumpism an ideology? By many measures, it “doesn’t measure up” to a classical ideology. Trumpism lacks a worked-out intellectual base and is not grounded in the writings of founders. Of course, Trump is the author of many books, including the well-known bestseller The Art of the Deal (1987), co-written with journalist Tony Schwartz. But that is certainly not Das Kapital or Mein Kampf

Trumpism is not a system of ideas, values, and convictions. It does not explain the world, it does not form a worldview. In other words, Trumpists pretend they have all that and that they possess a corresponding program of action — but in reality there is nothing of the sort.

An aggregate of different ideological elements

So far Trumpism looks like a raw and “unrefined,” and at times even scorched mix of various ingredients, such as:

  • “Conventionally right-wing” populism: pitting “ordinary people” (working class) against corrupt elites (legal, financial, and creative elites), although in reality such populism often smacks of leftism;
  • Neo-nationalism: prioritizing national interests (“America First”) over international obligations and globalism.
  • Economic protectionism: state interventions, a fixation on tariffs and trade restrictions to protect domestic production and jobs.
  • Anti-globalism and isolationism: skepticism toward international institutions, global phenomena, and processes;
  • Authoritarian tendencies: concentration of power, weakening of democratic institutions and systems of checks and balances.

Questionable political styles

Add to this certain elements of political style characteristic of Trumpists:

  • Cult of personality: it is still a long way from talk of Trump as the “great leader of the American people,” but within MAGA circles there is a pronounced tendency, at minimum, toward uncritical acceptance of everything Trump says and does;
  • Aggressive rhetoric, designed for the emotional rather than the rational sphere: to point out enemies, “galvanize” the electorate, and polarize society.
  • Demagoguery: both Trump himself and his MAGA people routinely juggle unreliable figures and facts, and generally engage in strange talk that to many politicians, especially Europeans, sounds simply bizarre.
  • Appointing poorly competent but personally loyal people to important positions.

We have a porridge of various ideological elements, seasoned with a questionable political style. It might seem like nothing serious. An ersatz ideology, a simulation of a political doctrine. Yet, nonetheless, Trumpism has become an important factor influencing world affairs, geopolitics, and geoeconomics. And for understandable reasons, today much depends on the Trumpists on how successful Ukrainian resistance to Moscow’s aggression will be.

We will continue to examine the “sources and components” of Trumpism in subsequent publications.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026