Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

IDF says it eliminated Ali Larijani — what it means for regional and Ukrainian security

Israel reported a strike on one of Iran’s leading officials; the operation could change Tehran’s tactics, affect energy markets and create new risks for European security — we break it down.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 17, 2026 · 3 min read

IDF says it eliminated Ali Larijani — what it means for regional and Ukrainian security
Алі Ларіджані (Фото: WAEL HAMZEH / EPA)

What happened

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced the "elimination" of Ali Larijani, who is described as the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council. According to the IDF, the strike on the official was carried out by the Israeli Air Force near Tehran based on its own intelligence. International agencies, including Reuters, also reported the incident.

Who Larijani is and why this matters

Israel calls Larijani the de facto coordinator of the Islamic Republic's foreign and military policy. According to several Western outlets, including The Wall Street Journal, he played a central role in suppressing mass protests in Iran and was a close associate of the Supreme Leader. The U.S. had previously imposed sanctions on him. That position makes him an important element of Iran's governance system and of planning operations abroad.

"For years Larijani was considered one of the most experienced and highest-ranking officials in the leadership of the Iranian regime... After the elimination of Khamenei, Larijani strengthened his status as the de facto leader"

— statement of the Israel Defense Forces (abridged)

The $10 million fact and reactions

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, commenting, recalled that, in his words, the U.S. had previously offered a reward of $10 mln for Larijani's head, and added: "We did it for free." Reuters and other agencies cited these words as an official Israeli statement. At the time of publication, Tehran's official response was limited: state outlets published recordings of the official, and Reuters quoted an unnamed Iranian official saying that offers of de-escalation reportedly made via intermediaries were rejected.

Meanwhile — strikes against other figures

The IDF also said that on March 16 it eliminated Gholamreza Soleimani, commander of the paramilitary Basij organization, which is part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and was involved in suppressing protests. Such strikes are being directed at a network that, according to the Israeli side, coordinates operations against Israel in the region.

Why this news matters for Ukraine

There are several practical consequences that directly affect Ukrainian interests. First, the risk of escalation increases, which can impact global energy markets: blockade of the Strait of Hormuz or heightened tensions in the Persian Gulf have previously affected oil and liquefied gas prices, which directly influence fuel costs in Ukraine. Second, rising tensions prompt greater military activity and restructuring of logistical corridors, which can affect the supply of weapons and materials in the region.

Risk assessment and possible scenarios

Scenarios could range from localized responses through proxy groups to broader strikes if Tehran decides to respond directly. A key factor will be the reaction of the U.S. and other Israeli partners — both diplomatic and military. Experts warn that in the short term the main risks for Europe and Ukraine remain volatility in energy prices and an increase in incidents along maritime routes.

"This is another blow to the regime's ability to coordinate hostile actions against Israel"

— Israel Defense Forces (comment on the operation)

Conclusion

Israel's statements have put the region on heightened alert. For Ukraine it is important to follow not only the operation itself but the dynamics of responses — at sea, in energy markets and in diplomatic channels. Whether this will grow into a wider escalation depends on decisions by several key players: Tehran, Washington, and European partners. We should prepare for market fluctuations and strengthen monitoring of supplies — practical steps that protect the country's security and economy.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026