Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"A stupid fake" to demoralize: the Office of the President refuted a planted claim about "three years of war" by a dubious journalist

While Ukraine fights for a just peace on the diplomatic front, the enemy is trying to sow despair through coordinated planted stories in Western media. The President's Office forcefully rejected journalist Boyan Panchevsky’s fantasies about an alleged "order from Zelensky to prepare for a three‑year war," calling them primitive disinformation.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 20, 2026 · 1 min read

"A stupid fake" to demoralize: the Office of the President refuted a planted claim about "three years of war" by a dubious journalist

Anatomy of manipulation: where the "shock" came from

A new wave of skepticism rose after a statement by The Wall Street Journal journalist Bojan Pancevski on the outlet's podcast. He claimed that the President of Ukraine, at a closed meeting with advisers, announced the failure of the negotiations and instructed them to fight for another three years, thereby allegedly "shocking" his circle.

The Presidential Office's reaction was immediate and direct. Presidential communications advisor Dmytro Lytvyn stated that neither such conversations nor any "three-year orders" ever took place.

"This is just a stupid fake. There was neither such a conversation with advisers, nor negativity about the negotiations, nor such an instruction."

– Dmytro Lytvyn, Presidential communications advisor

Who is behind the "sensation": a trail of propaganda

Western analysts and Ukrainian experts urge a critical approach to the figure of the story's author. Bojan Pancevski has long been under scrutiny for spreading narratives beneficial to the Kremlin.

Why trust in Pancevski is zero:

  • Working for the enemy: The journalist is listed in the "Myrotvorets" database for participating in humanitarian aggression against Ukraine and manipulating socially significant information.
  • History of fakes: Previously he promoted a dubious theory of a "Ukrainian trace" in the Nord Stream explosions and warned Germany of economic collapse from aiding Kyiv.
  • Distorting reality: As early as 2021 he tried to shift responsibility for the MH17 disaster onto Ukraine.

The real situation: negotiations continue

Despite attempts by disinformers to create the illusion of a dead end, the diplomatic process continues. Unlike Pancevski's anonymous "sources," official Kyiv emphasizes its readiness for dialogue. Ukraine expects the next meeting of delegations to take place as early as February.

Following the results of the latest round of talks in Geneva, Volodymyr Zelenskyy noted progress on the military front. This confirms that the situation is dynamic, and claims of a "180-degree turnaround" are merely part of the enemy's information-psychological operation.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026