Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

In Florida: Zelensky and Trump on a "strong deal" — security guarantees and the role of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant

The meeting began with a delay, but this is not a show: it is about security guarantees, possible territorial compromises and the management format of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant — decisions that could affect the country’s security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 28, 2025 · 2 min read

In Florida: Zelensky and Trump on a "strong deal" — security guarantees and the role of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant

What the leaders are negotiating

A meeting between Presidents Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Donald Trump has begun in Florida — with nearly a half-hour delay at the start. On the agenda are security guarantees, questions of possible territorial arrangements, and the role of Ukraine and partners in managing the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP).

"We have to sign an agreement."

— Donald Trump, President of the United States

Trump emphasized that there are no deadlines at the moment and that all parties allegedly "want to conclude an agreement." Zelenskyy, in his remarks, stressed the need for a step-by-step strategy and that the Ukrainian and American sides have discussed security guarantees at length.

"We will now discuss this strategy."

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

Key details and context

The talks moved into a closed session after initial statements to the press; another joint press conference is expected to follow. Before the Ukrainian delegation arrived, Trump held more than an hour of talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and, according to reporters on the ground, plans further contact after the meeting with Zelenskyy.

Why this matters: the format of guarantees, as well as the question of management of the ZNPP, touch simultaneously on security, sovereignty, and the technical safety of nuclear facilities. Any arrangements on "commissions" or joint management carry legal and practical consequences — from control over access to the plant to responsibility for its safety.

Risks and expectations

Analysts note that talk of a "strong deal" does not yet equal guarantees. The main risks are: vague wording regarding territories, the absence of mechanisms to monitor implementation of guarantees, and the possible influence of a third party on decisions about the NPP. The key question for Ukraine is how to turn political declarations into legally enforceable guarantees backed by resources and monitoring mechanisms.

What’s next

The closed phase of the negotiations and hours-long off-camera discussions indicate that the parties are working through the details. The task now for Ukrainian diplomacy is to secure clear mechanisms and transparent timelines so that words about an "agreement" have real force. The question remains open: will these declarations turn into practical guarantees that strengthen Ukraine's security?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026