Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and territories to be discussed in Paris — a test of international security guarantees

The Ukrainian delegation in Paris will raise the most difficult points of the core framework for ending the war — from the safety of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant to mechanisms for the return of territory. Why this matters for the security of every Ukrainian — in a short analysis.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and territories to be discussed in Paris — a test of international security guarantees

Why it matters

On Wednesday, January 7, in Paris the Ukrainian delegation will hold another round of talks with representatives of the United States and other partners, with a focus on the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant and the return of territories. For Ukraine this is not abstract diplomacy — it concerns the safety of citizens, risks to nuclear infrastructure, and the conditions for future restoration of sovereignty.

"We expect that, among other things, the most difficult issues from the basic framework on ending the war will be discussed — namely the issues regarding the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and the territories"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

What exactly is on the agenda

According to official information, the main topics are the safety of operating the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) (reducing the risk of a nuclear accident, access control, independent monitoring) and mechanisms for the return of territories (timelines, security guarantees, the role of international forces). Discussion of these issues will determine whether declarations will turn into concrete instruments that protect people's lives and infrastructure.

This is already the third session in two days with representatives of the U.S. administration, underlining the intensity and priority of the talks.

Who represents Ukraine

  • Rustem Umerov — Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council;
  • Andriy Hnatov — Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine;
  • Kyrylo Budanov — Head of the Office of the President;
  • Serhiy Kyslytsia — First Deputy Head of the Office of the President;
  • David Arakhamia — Head of the "Servant of the People" faction;
  • Oleksandr Bevz — Adviser to the Head of the Office of the President.

Paris context: what has already been signed

On January 6 in France a meeting of the "coalition of the willing" took place, which ended with the signing of the Paris Declaration "Reliable Security Guarantees for a Strong and Lasting Peace in Ukraine". That same day Ukraine, France and the United Kingdom signed a declaration of intent regarding the future deployment of multinational forces. This creates political and diplomatic pressure on the decision-making process, but also raises expectations for specifics — from funding to the format of guarantees.

What next

Declarations and signed intentions are a useful step, but the key question now is whether they will be turned into clear mechanisms that will guarantee the safety of the ZNPP and the return of territories to Ukraine's control. The partners' answers will determine how quickly and safely risks to millions of people can be reduced and full control over Ukrainian land restored.

Now it's up to the partners: will the signed declarations be enough to create real guarantees, and what compromises will have to be made in the process — questions that expect concrete answers over the next few weeks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026