Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Captured Ukrainian soldiers were shot in Shakhove — the prosecutor's office classifies it as a war crime

During an assault on positions in Donetsk region, occupying forces captured two fighters, shot them and stripped them of their clothes. A criminal investigation has been opened; the ombudsman has appealed to the Red Cross and the UN. We examine what this means for evidence collection and international accountability.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 29, 2025 · 2 min read

Captured Ukrainian soldiers were shot in Shakhove — the prosecutor's office classifies it as a war crime

What happened

On 27 December, during an assault on positions in the village of Shakhove in Pokrovskyi Raion, Russian forces captured two servicemen of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. According to the Office of the Prosecutor General and the Ombudsperson, the defenders were disarmed, one was forced to partially undress, after which both were shot dead. After the killings, the occupiers removed the clothing from the second deceased.

Legal context

Such an act falls under the definition of a war crime: international humanitarian law prohibits the killing and inhumane treatment of prisoners of war. A criminal investigation has already been launched.

"An investigation has been opened in criminal proceedings on the fact of committing a war crime that caused the death of a person."

— Office of the Prosecutor General

State actions and international contacts

Ombudsperson Dmytro Lubinets officially reported the incident and sent appeals to the International Committee of the Red Cross and the United Nations to document the rights violations and coordinate further actions. The prosecutor's office urges witnesses and anyone with information to report to the Ombudsperson's hotline: 0800501720.

Why this matters for security and justice

This case is not an isolated act of brutality but part of systemic violations, which have three consequences: first, they create an evidentiary basis for international tribunals; second, they raise questions about the responsibility of combat formations and commanders; third, they affect the morale of units and the civilian population in frontline communities.

Human rights and international law experts note that to hold perpetrators accountable it is important not only how Kyiv reacts, but also the prompt collection and verification of evidence and international coordination — from photo and video documentation to eyewitness testimony.

Previous incidents in the region

This case fits into a long series of violations in Pokrovskyi and neighboring districts. On 28 November, reports described an incident in which occupiers captured a serviceman, beat him and shot him. On 5 December the prosecutor's office recorded another incident near Sviato-Pokrovskyi, when a fighter who emerged with his hands raised was shot.

What next

Key steps are the rapid documentation and transfer of evidence, international coordination and the legal preparation of materials for subsequent proceedings. This also entails assessing the effectiveness of sanctions and deterrence policy: whether partners can turn testimony into legal accountability depends on the quality of the evidentiary base and political pressure.

A question for society and partners: will there be enough speed and resources to systematically document such crimes and achieve justice at the international level?

Contact for reports and testimonies: Ombudsperson's hotline — 0800501720.

— Ombudsperson of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine for Human Rights

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026