Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

SBS drone strike on GRU command post in Donetsk region — 51 killed, 74 wounded

A nighttime reconnaissance-strike operation by the Unmanned Systems Forces hit the headquarters of the 14th GRU Brigade in occupied Berdyansk — a strike that deals a blow to the command and combat capability of the special operations unit.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 28, 2025 · 2 min read

SBS drone strike on GRU command post in Donetsk region — 51 killed, 74 wounded

What happened

A nighttime operation by the Ukrainian Forces of Unmanned Systems (FUS) was directed at a command post and the deployment sites of special forces of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) in the temporarily occupied settlement of Berdyanske in Donetsk region. The strike was reported by FUS commander Robert (Madyar) Brovdi.

"The operation was planned in advance and carried out on the night of December 26"

— Robert (Madyar) Brovdi, commander of the Forces of Unmanned Systems

Result and sources

According to confirmed operational information, the strike recorded 51 dead ("200") and 74 wounded ("300"). The number of missing persons is not yet established. The commander also noted that the target was the 14th Separate GRU Brigade from Ussuriysk — a unit specializing in reconnaissance and special operations.

Why it matters

A strike on a command post not only destroys personnel but also disrupts the decision-making and coordination channels for the enemy's special operations. Such actions are an example of how precision reconnaissance and strike means can affect an opponent's tactical capabilities without large-scale escalation.

Context and related events

Incidents related to the 14th brigade and its subunits have a broad informational context. According to LIGA.net, on December 24 in Moscow two policemen were killed who, sources say, had participated in the war against Ukraine and were involved in the torture of prisoners. Also on December 26 there were reports of explosions in the parking area of a Russian military unit in Ussuriysk — actions that Ukrainian intelligence links to holding accountable units implicated in crimes against the civilian population.

What experts say

Defense analysts point out that a series of such strikes has a dual effect: it physically weakens the enemy and simultaneously works to psychologically demoralize those units that committed crimes. Specialists emphasize the importance of accurate intelligence and minimizing risks to the civilian population when planning operations.

Consequences and outlook

The defeat of the command post of the 14th GRU Brigade may temporarily complicate this formation's ability to conduct high-skilled special operations in the Donbas. At the same time, Russia may attempt to relocate groups or change communication schemes — this requires constant adaptation from Ukrainian intelligence and long-range systems. The question remains for partners: will there be sufficient support of intelligence and strike capabilities for such effects to be consolidated in the long term?

Data and statements provided by the command of the FUS; information regarding events in Moscow — according to LIGA.net; summaries and analysis — based on open sources and comments from defense-oriented analysts.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026