Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Blow to Redkin: SBU struck a plant — a supplier of fuel components for the Kh-55 and Kh-101

On the night of February 7, drones struck a research plant in Tver Oblast — a direct strike against rocket-fuel supply chains and an important signal in the context of sanctions and defense strategy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Blow to Redkin: SBU struck a plant — a supplier of fuel components for the Kh-55 and Kh-101

What happened

According to LIGA.net, citing an interlocutor in the SBU, on the night of February 7 drones from the Center for Special Operations "Alpha" struck the Redkino Research Plant in the settlement of Redkino in Tver Oblast. The facility, sources say, manufactures fuel components for cruise missiles, in particular the Kh-55 and Kh-101, as well as fuel additives for diesel fuel and aviation kerosene. The FIRMS service recorded a large fire on the enterprise's grounds; regional authorities also confirmed the fire and reported a drone attack.

"The Security Service of Ukraine struck a chemical enterprise in Tver Oblast that produces components of rocket fuel."

— interlocutor in the SBU, LIGA.net

Why it matters

Three key reasons. First, this is a direct strike on the production element of missile systems — it is not about munitions, but about the materials without which missiles cannot be launched. Second, the plant had been under international sanctions (U.S., U.K., etc.), so the operation increases economic pressure on supply chains. Third, the recorded fire has been confirmed by independent monitoring services (FIRMS) and local authorities — meaning there are multiple independent sources corroborating the damage to the facility.

Context and signs of a pattern

This strike should be seen in a broader context: in recent days the region has experienced power and utility outages in Belgorod, and the General Staff reported a series of successful strikes on the Kapustin Yar training ground in Astrakhan Oblast. For analysts, this looks like part of a strategy aimed at steadily complicating the logistics and production of missile systems in Russia.

Consequences and outlook

One strike rarely solves the problem completely, but it can:

  • temporarily complicate the supply of critical components for cruise missile launches;
  • amplify the effect of sanctions by making access to technologies and materials more difficult;
  • send a clear signal that supply chains are not untouchable.

Analysts note that the effect will depend on Russia's ability to reroute or restore production and on whether Ukraine continues systematic efforts to detect and strike key nodes in the supply chain.

What next? As attention — and missile capabilities — are redistributed, it is important to monitor confirmations from independent sources and whether this tactical success will translate into a sustained strategic weakening of the adversary.

Note: available videos from the scene contain profanity.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026