Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

# Strike Against Legless Veteran — and Transfer to the Front: What's Wrong With the Army's Response

# A military TCC officer who struck veteran Artem Moroz, who uses prosthetics, on the head will face punishment in the form of deployment to the front lines. However, police opened a case only for "minor bodily injury," video evidence was destroyed under pressure, and the victim himself is an active serviceman of the 241st brigade.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 23, 2026 · 2 min read

# Strike Against Legless Veteran — and Transfer to the Front: What's Wrong With the Army's Response
Артем Мороз (Фото: artemm79/Instagram)

On the evening of May 21, an alert group from the Shevchenko Territorial Defense Center (TDC) stopped the car of Artem Moroz at the intersection with Ivan Vyhovskyi Street. When the veteran's wife Olesya Zhdanova began recording what was happening on her phone, one of eight people in balaclavas approached and struck Artem on the head. He fell to the ground. His prosthetics are not visible, but they are there — Moroz lost both legs in Kherson region in the first months of the full-scale invasion.

Moroz is not simply a veteran in a static sense of the word. After rehabilitation, he returned to the army and serves in the 241st Brigade, where he provides psychological support to the wounded, assists those released from captivity, and helps families of the fallen. In parallel — he dances ballroom dances on prosthetics, runs marathons, and recently performed at Times Square in New York.

«I show guys who are now in despair how I dance, swim, run — and by my own example prove that life has not stopped»

Artem Moroz, according to LB.ua

What happened to the evidence

According to Zhdanova, during the incident, not only people in balaclavas from the TDC were present, but also police officers. The video recording she managed to make was deleted under pressure. Police opened proceedings under Article 125 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine — "Intentional minor bodily injury." Doctors on site suspected a concussion.

An official response appeared the next day: the Kyiv City TDC acknowledged the use of force and promised disciplinary action for "direct participants and their leadership." The Command of the Ground Forces went further — announced the transfer of the guilty to combat units.

«The use of physical force by a TDC servicemember against a veteran cannot be justified by anything»

Command of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Punishment or career path

Sending to the front as a disciplinary measure is an unconventional construction. Formally, this is neither dismissal, nor criminal prosecution, nor deprivation of rank. In a context where thousands of people avoid mobilization, such "punishment" looks like an administrative decision that closes a public scandal without disrupting the system.

According to LIGA.net, citing the National Police, since the beginning of the full-scale war in Ukraine, over 600 attacks on military TDC and SP personnel have been recorded. But this case is a mirror image: it was not the TDC that was attacked, but the TDC that struck the person the system should have protected. Among those affected — an active servicemember with the highest disability category.

  • Police classified the incident as "minor bodily injury" — pending determination of severity after examination
  • Video evidence was destroyed in the presence of law enforcement, no criminal proceedings were opened on this fact
  • The internal investigation is being conducted by the TDC itself — the body whose subordinates committed the incident

The question is not whether this particular soldier will go to the front. The question is whether criminal proceedings will be initiated for destruction of evidence — and if not, then the next incident involving an alert group will happen with the understanding that the video can be taken away without consequences.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026