Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

"Retaliatory Strikes, Not Escalation: Zelensky Explains Logic Behind Attacks on Russian Energy Infrastructure After Meeting with Fico"

The President clearly drew the line: Ukraine strikes Russian energy infrastructure exclusively with its own weapons and will stop as soon as Russia stops. So far, Russia has not stopped.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 9, 2026 · 2 min read

"Retaliatory Strikes, Not Escalation: Zelensky Explains Logic Behind Attacks on Russian Energy Infrastructure After Meeting with Fico"
Володимир Зеленський (фото: t.me/V_Zelenskiy_official)
```html

On September 5 in Uzhhorod, following a meeting with Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that Ukraine will not reduce strikes on Russian energy facilities — as long as Russia continues to attack Ukrainian energy infrastructure. The formula is brief: "Reductions in strikes on Russian energy will happen when strikes on Ukrainian energy reduce."

The meeting took place against the backdrop of a specific conflict: Hungary and Slovakia — the only EU countries still importing Russian oil through the Druzhba pipeline — turned to Brussels after August strikes by the Armed Forces on this oil pipeline. Fico came to Uzhhorod with complaints. Zelensky responded that he was ready to supply Slovakia with gas and oil — but not Russian.

"No one will simply tolerate sitting in the dark"

Volodymyr Zelensky, briefing in Uzhhorod, September 5, 2025

Own weapons — a separate signal

The president separately emphasized that long-range strikes against Russian territory are carried out by Ukraine using domestically produced weapons and are not coordinated with the United States. Back in August, Zelensky confirmed this position in response to a Wall Street Journal report that the Pentagon had been blocking the use of American missiles deep inside Russia for months. According to him, the range of Ukrainian weapons reaches from 150 to 3,000 kilometers.

That same day provided concrete confirmation. The General Staff of the Armed Forces reported that on the night of September 5, the Unmanned Systems Forces, Special Operations Forces, and the GUR struck the Ryazan oil refinery — one of Russia's four largest, with a design capacity of 17.1 million tons of oil per year. A hit was recorded on the primary processing unit ELOU-AVT-6. The governor of Ryazan Oblast, Pavel Malkov, confirmed the attack.

Tactical context

Strikes on Russia's oil refining infrastructure are not random: according to Reuters, in September 2025, Russian oil product exports fell by 17.1% compared to August. Oil refineries are part of the logistics chain supplying fuel to the Russian army. Zelensky also received "signals" from some Western partners asking to reduce the intensity of attacks due to energy market instability — and publicly rejected them without disclosing who had requested this.

  • Ryazan oil refinery — strike confirmed by the General Staff of the Armed Forces and the Russian governor
  • Additionally, positions of two S-400 air defense divisions in Kaluga Oblast and a drone warehouse in occupied Luhansk were hit
  • Ukraine produced over 2 million drones in 2024, planning at least 4 million in 2025

Fico and Zelensky reached no agreements. The Slovak prime minister, who had met with Putin in Beijing the day before, left Uzhhorod with an unchanged position on oil transit. Three months later, on December 1, Ukraine struck the Druzhba pipeline again — despite appeals from Budapest and Bratislava.

If Russia continues to ignore the condition of symmetric cessation of strikes on energy infrastructure — and there are currently no signals of its readiness to do so — will Slovakia and Hungary retain the political ability to block EU sanctions decisions, citing their own energy losses from this same war?

```

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026