Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Ukraine seeks to hasten the end of the war before the U.S. elections — Sybiha on timing and risks

The Foreign Ministry says the diplomatic "impulse" must be mobilized by November. Why is Kyiv aligning itself with the U.S. election cycle, and what does that mean for negotiations and security?

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 8, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukraine seeks to hasten the end of the war before the U.S. elections — Sybiha on timing and risks

Behind the scenes of the negotiations: why timelines matter

The interview of Foreign Minister Andriy Sybyha with Reuters on February 6 contains a clear message: Kyiv seeks to accelerate the peace process and to use the diplomatic momentum ahead of key American events. This refers, in particular, to the US midterm elections to Congress in November — a factor that can change Washington's political will and the pace of assistance.

"In my assessment, we have momentum, that's true. We need to consolidate or mobilize these peace efforts, and we are ready to speed up the process"

— Andriy Sybyha, Ukraine's foreign minister

What's on the table: the 20‑point plan and "hard" questions

Sybyha confirmed that the 20‑point plan that formed the basis of the latest rounds of talks involving Ukraine, Russia and US mediation has only a few unresolved items. According to him, the most sensitive and most difficult issues require decisions at the leaders' level — therefore, technical agreements are already close, but key compromises have not yet been reached.

"Only a few items remain unresolved — the most sensitive and most difficult questions, which must be solved at the leaders' level"

— Andriy Sybyha, Ukraine's foreign minister

Ukraine's position: conditions for respecting sovereignty

The Foreign Ministry clearly rejects any attempts to legitimize Russian control over Ukrainian territories. In the same interview Sybyha emphasized that Ukraine does not recognize Crimea and parts of Donbas as Russian and will not support agreements like the so‑called "Dmitriev package" concluded in Kyiv's absence. This is a key red line for further talks.

"Ukraine will not recognize its temporarily occupied territories, Crimea and Donbas, as Russian and will not support agreements such as the 'Dmitriev package' concluded without it"

— Andriy Sybyha, Ukraine's foreign minister

Why this matters for security and support

Electoral cycles in the US genuinely affect the pace and character of international assistance: a change in the composition of Congress can weaken or strengthen funding and political backing. Therefore, it makes sense for Kyiv to seek a window of opportunity now — while there is international interest and political will among mediators.

At the same time — important operational work: to cement the agreements reached, to lock in partners' positions and to prevent the diplomatic momentum from dissipating along with electoral turbulence.

What's next

Kyiv's rhetoric is clear and consistent: mobilize diplomatic momentum, preserve red lines on territorial issues and move the talks from a tactical level to the leaders' level, where key questions are decided. As President Volodymyr Zelensky stressed, Washington had already proposed efforts to end the war by the start of summer — now the task for Ukraine and its partners is to turn such proposals into concrete agreements and guarantees.

Forecast. If the diplomatic momentum is consolidated and accompanied by strengthened political support in the US and the EU, there is a real chance to make progress on the "most difficult" points of the plan. Otherwise — the negotiation window risks narrowing as the elections approach.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026