Briefly — and why it matters

In high diplomacy, practical results matter more than loud statements. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in an interview with The New York Post cites a simple and telling comparative figure: to destroy one Russian 'Shahed' Ukraine needs about $10,000, whereas when Patriot missiles are used the cost of an interception can reach $4 million.

Economics of interception

The difference in costs is not abstract statistics. The Ukrainian approach is based on mass deployment and inexpensive interceptor drones (estimated price per unit — $3,000–5,000), which makes it possible to handle hundreds of attacks without depleting limited stocks of expensive missiles. It's a matter of scalability: if the enemy produces hundreds or thousands of UAVs, a defense that costs millions per unit proves ineffective and unsustainable in the long term.

"What is our expertise? That an interceptor drone costs $3,000–5,000. So for one 'Shahed' it costs about $10,000, while a Patriot missile costs $4 million."

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, president of Ukraine (interview with The New York Post)

Scale of the threat and trends

According to the president's estimate, Russia is currently attacking with roughly 350–500 drones per day and plans to increase the flow to 600–800 per day in 2026 with a potential target of 1,000 daily. Such dynamics make traditional air-defense approaches costly and logistically challenging.

What this means for partners

Ukraine is already exporting not only equipment but also experience — according to Zelenskyy, there are requests from several countries (six states are mentioned, as well as separate appeals from the US and Jordan). Part of the joint efforts has already been directed at protecting American bases in Jordan: interceptors and teams of specialists travelled to the sites to help adapt the systems.

Analysts and regional experts, notably Deputy Director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies Serhiy Danylov (LIGA.net), warn that escalation in the region could have side effects for Ukraine's interests, so the exchange of technologies and knowledge is not only altruism but also an element of mutual security.

Conclusion — what's next

The numbers show that cheap interceptors make countering mass attacks viable and scalable. The key question now is whether partners will turn declarations and requests into concrete deliveries and coordination. For Ukraine, this is a chance not only to defend itself more effectively but also to develop a new export direction — tactical solutions for combating unmanned threats worldwide.