Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Uranium Without Money and 10 Days of Silence: What Trump Announced — and What's Still Missing From the Deals

Trump announced that the US will remove Iranian nuclear "dust" for free, while Israel and Lebanon agreed to a 10-day ceasefire. The details of the mechanisms for implementing both agreements remain an open question.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Uranium Without Money and 10 Days of Silence: What Trump Announced — and What's Still Missing From the Deals
Дональд Трамп (Фото: RONDA CHURCHILL / EPA)

On April 16, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump announced two pieces of news from the Middle East — and both were formulated in his characteristic style: as accomplished results, not as a framework agreement with open ends.

Uranium: Declaration of Free Extraction

In a Truth Social post, Trump wrote that the United States would obtain all the nuclear "dust" resulting from American B-2 bomber strikes on Iran's underground facilities, and would not pay a cent for it. "Nuclear dust" refers to the remnants of enriched uranium buried after Operation Midnight Hammer, conducted on June 22, 2025, when seven B-2 Spirit bombers attacked the underground Fordо facility at a depth of 90 meters.

"The U.S. and Iran will jointly extract and remove all deeply buried nuclear dust. No uranium enrichment will be permitted."

— Donald Trump, Truth Social, April 16, 2026

According to the IAEA's assessment, as of June 2025, Iran possessed approximately 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium. The agency's director noted in March that roughly half of the stockpile was stored at an underground facility near Isfahan, with the rest buried in the wreckage of Natanz or Fordо.

The devil is in the details. Trump claimed that "many of the 15 points have already been agreed upon," but his posts refer to an American 15-point plan for ending the war — a plan that Iran has not recognized as a basis for negotiations. No specific verification mechanism, extraction timeline, or role for the IAEA was mentioned in the announcement.

Lebanon: 10-Day Ceasefire with "Certain Conditions"

Trump announced that Israel and Lebanon agreed to a 10-day ceasefire, which took effect on Thursday at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The State Department defined its purpose as "enabling good-faith negotiations toward a permanent agreement on security and peace between Israel and Lebanon."

The agreement was reached after Trump's call with Netanyahu — Israel agreed "under certain conditions." Following this, Secretary of State Rubio called Lebanese President Aoun and obtained his commitment.

  • In the 24 hours before the ceasefire, the Israeli military struck more than 380 Hezbollah targets in southern Lebanon.
  • Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon called the agreement "complex," while Iran's ambassador approached the pause "with caution."
  • Israel stated that it would maintain its forces in southern Lebanon despite the ceasefire.

Context Not to Lose Sight Of

Parallel to the Lebanese ceasefire, the U.S. and Iran are in a two-week cessation of fire established on April 7 — and the end of this regime is approaching: new peace negotiations could take place as soon as this weekend.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Galibaff stated that any attempt to limit uranium enrichment will fail. This directly contradicts what Trump presented as "agreed upon."

Two open variables will determine whether these announcements translate into real commitments: whether Iran will agree to verified physical removal of uranium under international supervision — and whether the Lebanese ceasefire will withstand Israel's "certain conditions," the contents of which have not been publicly disclosed.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026