Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Usyk defeats Vorovenko by knockout in 11th round, losing two judges out of three — and immediately questions about a rematch arise

# Technical knockout after the bell, Dutch protests, and Usyk's words about his daughter in a bomb shelter — the fight in Giza left more questions than answers

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 24, 2026 · 2 min read

Usyk defeats Vorovenko by knockout in 11th round, losing two judges out of three — and immediately questions about a rematch arise
Олександр Усик (Фото: Ring Magazine/Х)

Oleksandr Usyk defended his WBC, WBA, and IBF belts in the heavyweight division, stopping Dutch kickboxer Rico Verhoeven with a technical knockout in the 11th round. The fight took place in the early morning of May 24, 2026, in the open air at the foot of the pyramids in Giza — and ended in a scandal that instantly overshadowed the victory itself.

Controversial Finish: Fight Stopped After the Bell

Going into the 11th round, two of three judges had it even or in favor of Verhoeven. Usyk fought as the second aggressor, relying on mobility and counterattacks, while the Dutchman constantly pressed, trying to pin the champion against the ropes. In the decisive round, Usyk sent Verhoeven down with an uppercut, after which the referee stopped the fight — but according to critics, after the final bell had already sounded.

"Terrible referee work — stopping the fight after the bell"

— trainer-analyst Teddy Atlas

Verhoeven called the stoppage premature and immediately filed an official protest. His trainer openly called for a rematch. Jake Paul wrote on social media that Usyk lost on points. Promoter Oleksandr Krassyuk reacted differently: "Boxing got a new icon — bravo, Rico".

Verhoeven: 49 Wins in Kickboxing, One Boxing Fight Before Usyk

The Dutchman's record in professional boxing before the fight was 1-0, and that single bout in 2014 was against an opponent with a 0-5 record. Verhoeven built his main career in kickboxing, where he came to the show with a 49-8 record and a streak of 22 consecutive victories. Two weeks before the fight with Usyk, he was still competing at Glory 100, defeating Artem Vakhitov by unanimous decision.

The WBC created an exclusive belt specifically for this evening — the "King of the Nile" — which went to Usyk along with a championship chain with diamonds and emeralds worth approximately $40,000.

"My Daughter Wrote to Me: Daddy, You'll Win"

After the result was announced, Usyk said into the microphone that while the fight was going on, Russia was attacking Kyiv. His daughter was writing to him from a shelter. These few words spread across the network faster than the fight highlights themselves — and reminded people of the context in which all of the Ukrainian's victories over the past four years have taken place.

  • The WBA and IBF belts would not have gone to Verhoeven even if he had won — the Dutchman is not ranked by these organizations.
  • The WBC — the only title that was actually on the line for both fighters.
  • Usyk came into the fight after his rematch with Dubois in July 2025 — and maintained his streak of 24 consecutive professional victories.

Verhoeven's official protest has already been filed. If the WBC reviews it and finds the stoppage incorrect — the fight result could theoretically be overturned. If not, the rematch question moves to negotiations: Verhoeven proved he was capable of dominating Usyk on the scorecards for ten out of eleven rounds, and that is the strongest argument for a new contract.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026