Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Verkhovna Rada asked the IOC to reinstate the ban on athletes from Russia and Belarus — a matter of principle and security

Parliament has appealed to world leaders and the International Paralympic Committee, demanding the reinstatement of a full ban on participation by athletes from Russia and Belarus in international competitions. We examine why this matters now and what consequences it could have for the 2025 Paralympics and international sport.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 18, 2025 · 2 min read

Verkhovna Rada asked the IOC to reinstate the ban on athletes from Russia and Belarus — a matter of principle and security

What the Verkhovna Rada did

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted an appeal to the heads of state, parliaments and governments of democratic countries and to the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) demanding the reinstatement of a full ban on the participation of athletes from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus in all international sporting competitions, including the Paralympic Games. The decision was adopted in full and recorded in the register under No. 14204. The information was distributed by the UNN news agency and published on the Verkhovna Rada website.

Position and specific demands

In the appeal, the parliament calls for a review of the IPC General Assembly decision of 27 September 2025 and for the restoration of the previous sanction regime concerning athletes and delegations of the aggressor states. It separately emphasizes the need to protect the principles of humanism, justice and human rights on which the international Paralympic movement is based.

The Rada also asks to impose restrictions on the entry of sports delegations from aggressor states into democratic countries until the aggression of the Russian Federation fully ceases and Ukraine’s territorial integrity is restored. In a separate line — a call for the organizers of the World Games 2025 to continue sanctions against athletes from the Russian Federation and Belarus.

The Verkhovna Rada adopted in full the draft Resolution on the Appeal of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine to the heads of state, parliaments and governments of democratic countries of the world, the International Paralympic Committee regarding the ban on participation of athletes of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus in international sports competitions (registry No. 14204)

— website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine

Why it matters

Firstly, it is a signal to the international sporting movement: sport does not exist in isolation from international security and human rights. Secondly, the reinstatement of the ban creates additional political and reputational pressure on the aggressor state. Thirdly, for Ukrainian athletes and volunteers this is a matter of justice — in wartime the presence of delegations from countries conducting aggression has both political and psychological dimensions.

What next

The initiative now moves to international addressees: the IPC, organizers of global tournaments and partner governments. The Verkhovna Rada’s decision strengthens diplomatic pressure and provides a basis for coordination with allies — from official statements to possible practical restrictions during events. Analysts note that the impact will depend on the willingness of organizing countries and international federations to act in concert.

Whether the IPC agrees to review its decision and whether the international community supports the Ukrainian approach — this will determine how quickly sport responds to the challenges created by the war.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026