Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

From 1:10 to 1:2: How Czech Initiative Changed Artillery Balance on the Front

The Czech initiative has already supplied Ukraine with nearly a million shells in 2025 and could reach 1.8 million by year's end — but its future depends on elections in Czechia this autumn.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 16, 2026 · 2 min read

From 1:10 to 1:2: How Czech Initiative Changed Artillery Balance on the Front
Марк Рютте на пресконференції 16 квітня 2026 року (Фото: EPA/MARTIN DIVISEK)

On April 16, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte arrived in Prague — and met not with the initiative's initiator, but with its potential liquidator. The Prime Minister of Czechia is now Andrej Babiš, who has spent months calling the ammunition purchased under this scheme "old, moldy, and overpriced."

What the initiative actually delivered

The Czech scheme emerged in spring 2024 as an anti-crisis measure: the United States suspended aid, the EU was lagging in deliveries, and Ukraine was spending ammunition faster than it was receiving it. Czech President Petr Pavel proposed purchasing ammunition on the global market — including from countries cooperating with Russia — using allied funds.

The result proved tangible. Over 2024, Ukraine received up to 1.5 million shells of various calibers. As of August 2025, Ukraine had already received about one million shells under the initiative, and this figure could reach 1.8 million by year's end.

"The initiative helped change the ratio of shells exchanged between Ukraine and Russia from 1:10 to 1:2."

— Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General, press conference in Prague

Ukrainian command confirms the dynamics: at the beginning of 2024 the ratio was 1:8, and by summer had improved to 1:2. This is not victory — but it is a different war.

Babiš on stage, Fiala in the audience

The initiative was launched by the previous government of Petr Fiala. Now Rutte is praising the scheme before Babiš — the very same person who criticized it. Babiš called the purchased shells "old, moldy, and overpriced," providing no evidence, and stated that if ANO forms a government, the initiative would be scrapped.

Rutte, however, publicly urged allies to continue financing: "I call on the countries listening to us now and the other 31 allies to continue funding this initiative so that Ukraine receives the ammunition needed to deter the Russians."

Production catching up with demand — slowly

In parallel with market purchases, Czechia is ramping up its own production. Czech company STV Group plans to increase output to 300,000 shells per year from 2025 — including 155mm artillery shells. The doubling to 200,000 will occur after launching a new line, with full capacity of 300,000 expected in 2026. This matters: market supplies are being depleted, and without domestic production, the "Shell Bridge" scheme will gradually exhaust itself.

  • 2024: up to 1.5 million shells delivered through the initiative
  • August 2025: ~1 million shells in the current year
  • Forecast by end of 2025: up to 1.8 million shells
  • Artillery ratio: improved from 1:10 to 1:2

If Babiš does freeze the initiative after forming a coalition, the question is not whether other coordinators will be found — but whether NATO countries' own production will manage to close the gap before market supplies run out.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026