Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Starlink shutdown weakened enemy communications — how it helped counterattacks in the south

Serhiy Prytula explains why the blocking of SpaceX terminals created a tactical problem for the Russians near the front — and why this could change the course of local operations.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Starlink shutdown weakened enemy communications — how it helped counterattacks in the south
Сергій Притула (скриншот з відео LIGA.net)

What happened and why it matters

In areas closer to the front line, Russian units have indeed experienced noticeable coordination difficulties after the blocking of Starlink satellite terminals. This was told in an interview with LIGA.net by public figure and volunteer Serhiy Prytula. The effect is most pronounced in zones up to 20 km from the front line — precisely where the communications that provided operational linkage between infantry, attack UAVs and artillery proved most vulnerable.

How the adversary is trying to restore communications

According to open-source information, the Russians are partially compensating for the loss of the satellite channel by laying fiber-optic lines and setting up Wi‑Fi bridges. During the installation of such equipment, Ukrainian units employ tactical actions — in particular FPV drone strikes on equipment and communications infrastructure — which additionally complicates the restoration of the network.

"But it is at this level, of course, that their coordination of actions has significantly worsened. In turn, we seem to be able to take advantage of this small disorganization and are achieving certain successes on the Zaporizhzhia direction..."

— Serhiy Prytula, public figure and volunteer

Expert assessment and confirmation

Experts from Defence Express emphasized that for the Russians the Starlink terminals were a tool of inter-service command, which allowed them to synchronize the actions of infantry, UAVs and artillery almost in real time. In addition, statements by the Armed Forces of Ukraine on 16 February 2026 indicate that the blocking of Starlink became one of the factors that facilitated counterattacks in the southern direction. Estonian intelligence also noted that restrictions on access to Telegram and the blocking of some SpaceX services complicated Russian operations.

"Starlink terminals gave the enemy the ability to link small strike groups, drones and artillery into a single operational cycle — but when that channel is broken, coordinating such strikes becomes much harder."

— Ivan Kyrychevskyi, weapons expert, Defence Express

Context: registration of terminals and the rules of the game

At the end of January, Ukraine introduced a Starlink registration system for military and civilian users — unverified terminals are subject to disconnection. This decision, according to the official version, is intended to prevent equipment from being used by the enemy. Together with actions by SpaceX, it changed the technical conditions on the battlefield.

Conclusion — what next?

Disconnecting Starlink is not a standalone "silver bullet," but it is an example of how control over communication channels creates tactical windows. Russia has ways to adapt, but each delay in its coordination gives Ukrainian forces a chance for local successes. Whether this will grow into a sustained operational advantage will depend on the pace of adaptation on both sides and on how effectively Ukraine and its partners manage access to critical communications resources.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026