Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Vilnius Closed Hundreds of Times Before and Keeps Happening Again: Lithuania Handed Protest Note to Minsk Over May Incident

Since June 2025, Belarus has launched over 315 unregistered probes into Lithuanian airspace. Vilnius Airport was blocked again on May 13 — and the diplomatic ritual repeated itself.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Vilnius Closed Hundreds of Times Before and Keeps Happening Again: Lithuania Handed Protest Note to Minsk Over May Incident
Кястутіс Будріс (Фото: EPA / Martin Divisek)

On the night of May 13, weather balloons launched from Belarusian territory entered Lithuanian airspace and forced air traffic control services to temporarily close Vilnius airport. On May 14, Lithuania's Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned Belarus's chargé d'affaires and handed him a protest note. This is neither the first nor, apparently, the last such incident.

Not an Anomaly, but a Pattern

The May 13 incident is part of a persistent trend. According to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, from June to December 2025 alone, 315 unregistered balloons crossed the Lithuanian border, with a peak in October—71 incursions in a single month. Vilnius airport was closed on average twice a week.

Formally, the balloons are used to smuggle cigarettes—Belarusian-made and counterfeit ones. But Lithuania has long stopped treating this as a routine border violation.

"Vilnius considers these repeated incidents a hybrid attack against Lithuania, for which Belarus bears responsibility."

From the note of Lithuania's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, handed to the Belarusian diplomat on May 14, 2026

What Lithuania Has Already Tried

  • Border closure. On October 29, 2025, Lithuania closed all border crossings with Belarus. Three weeks later, it reopened them—as a "gesture of goodwill." The balloons did not stop.
  • State of emergency. In December 2025, the Lithuanian government declared a state of emergency, citing threats to national security and civil aviation.
  • Appeal to the EU. Lithuania's Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budris appealed to Brussels for new sanctions against Minsk—including a complete freeze of transactions for 10 Belarusian banks and a ban on rapeseed oil imports.

Minsk and the Rhetoric of Parallel Reality

At a Security Council meeting in December 2025, Lukashenko called the closure of the Lithuanian border a "crazy fraud" and proposed that Vilnius conduct bilateral negotiations without intermediaries. Minsk officially denies involvement in the balloon launches.

Meanwhile, according to RFE/RL, around a thousand Lithuanian trucks remain blocked on the Belarusian side of the border—their owners are forced to pay 120 euros per day for parking, and non-payment threatens confiscation.

Diplomacy Without Leverage

The April protest note is not the first: Lithuania took a similar step on December 3, 2025. Then, the airspace over Vilnius was restricted for over seven hours, affecting 27 flights and over three thousand passengers.

The problem is not a lack of legal grounds—airspace violations have been documented and recorded. The problem is that Belarus does not respond to notes, and the EU has still not imposed new sanctions despite pressure from Vilnius.

If Brussels does not introduce sectoral sanctions against Minsk by the end of summer—will Lithuania change tactics from diplomatic notes to something with real costs for the Belarusian side?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026