Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Anthony Joshua's driver faces four charges after crash in Nigeria — two coaches killed

A 46-year-old driver of a British boxer has been charged over a fatal crash near Lagos. We examine which charges have been brought, why this matters for sport and athletes’ travel safety, and what to expect next.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 2, 2026 · 2 min read

Anthony Joshua's driver faces four charges after crash in Nigeria — two coaches killed

Briefly

The Nigerian police have accused the driver of British boxer Anthony Joshua of being responsible for a traffic accident near Lagos that killed two people — the athlete’s trainers. The information was published by Sky News, citing local law enforcement.

Charges and hearing schedule

According to authorities, 46‑year‑old Adeniyi Mobolaji Kayode has been charged with four offences: dangerous driving causing death, careless and negligent driving, driving without due care and attention, and driving without a valid national driving licence. The case is set to begin on 20 January.

What exactly happened

The crash occurred on 29 December near Lagos: a black Lexus SUV with Joshua in the back seat collided with a truck. The collision killed Latif Aiyodele and Sina Gami — both were the fighter’s trainers. Anthony Joshua himself sustained minor injuries and was hospitalized.

Sporting context

The incident came a few days after a match in Miami where Joshua knocked out Jake Paul. Professionally, the Brit has faced Ukrainian champion Oleksandr Usyk twice: in September 2021 and in the rematch in August 2022, both fights ending in Usyk’s victory on points. This timeline heightens media attention on the event — given that it involves a public figure whose travels and entourage immediately become the subject of scrutiny.

"Sky News reported this, citing the country's police."

— Sky News (citing Nigeria's police)

Why this matters

This is not only a criminal case against an individual driver. First, it raises questions about the responsibility of teams and the safety of athlete transportation during international trips. Second, the case highlights how quickly reputational risks can affect both the boxer and his team, especially when deaths are involved. Transport safety and sports management experts point to the need for clear procedures and checks when organizing trips — from verifying drivers’ documents to route planning and ensuring emergency support.

What to expect next

In the short term, key will be the evidence the prosecution presents at the 20 January hearing: the technical condition of the vehicles, the results of expert examinations, and eyewitness testimony. For the public and the media it is important to follow the course of the investigation rather than emotions: whether the court will find the driver guilty, and whether additional circumstances will emerge that shift the focus from individual responsibility to systemic safety issues.

While the investigation continues, the question remains simple and painful: how to protect people's lives when major shows, international travel and tight schedules are involved? This question concerns not only sport but every community that wants travel to be safe.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026