Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Vovchansk: Russian forces are trying to encircle Ukrainian units — what this means for the front

The head of communications for the Joint Forces, Viktor Trehubov, reports flanking attacks on southern positions in the devastated Vovchansk. We analyze the risks to logistics, possible scenarios, and what this means for the defense of the region.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Vovchansk: Russian forces are trying to encircle Ukrainian units — what this means for the front
Вовчанськ (Фото: instagram.com/libkos)

What happened

Vovchansk in the Kharkiv region is largely in ruins, and Russian units control much of the city. On a telethon broadcast, the head of the Communications Department of the Joint Forces grouping, Viktor Tregubov, reported that the enemy is trying to encircle Ukrainian units holding positions in the southern part of the city.

"Most of Vovchansk is, objectively, now in ruins. And most of those ruins, unfortunately, are under the control of Russian forces. Despite a Ukrainian presence remaining in the southern part of the city, the enemy is attempting to eliminate it."

— Viktor Tregubov, head of the Communications Department of the Joint Forces grouping (telethon broadcast)

Situation on the ground

According to Tregubov, the enemy is conducting flanking attacks, trying to envelop the units in the south and force them to withdraw or become encircled. Holding positions in a ruined city complicates defense and the organization of supplies.

Why this matters

Encirclement is not only a tactical success for the enemy but also a blow to logistics: cut-off approaches make it harder to deliver ammunition, evacuate the wounded, and rotate forces. This factor often determines whether a unit can hold a position for long.

The comparison with Kupiansk, where the Russians are confined to a few buildings and cut off from main forces, underscores the area's specifics — in Vovchansk, due to the scale of destruction and the enemy's concentration, the task is more difficult.

What experts point out

Military experts point to two critical variables: the availability of supply lines and the ability to maneuver reserves. If commanders can maintain resupply and apply countermeasures to the enemy's flanks, the risk of encirclement will decrease. Otherwise — positions may come under significant pressure.

"So it's simply to envelop the Ukrainian troops in the south of the city and force them to withdraw, or even be encircled. They haven't succeeded, but they are trying very actively. It's really difficult there — in a ruined city it's not easy to hold any defence."

— Viktor Tregubov, head of the Communications Department of the Joint Forces grouping

Conclusion

The situation in Vovchansk demonstrates how local tactical actions can have broader consequences for the front. The outcome will depend on logistical resilience and the speed of command decisions: for now Ukrainian units are holding, but the coming days will be critical. Whether it will be possible to reduce the pressure and shift the initiative is a question that requires attention from both military leadership and the partners responsible for provision.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026