Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Elections in the Building Where the Mayor Was Killed: Deir al-Balah Votes for the First Time in 21 Years

# 70 thousand voters in a city that Israel declared a "safe zone," but where an Israeli airstrike destroyed the city council building itself. HAMAS is boycotting — and that's precisely why the elections took place.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Elections in the Building Where the Mayor Was Killed: Deir al-Balah Votes for the First Time in 21 Years
Вибори в секторі Гази 25 квітня (Фото: EPA/HAITHAM IMAD)

On Saturday, April 25, local elections were held in the Gaza Strip for the first time since 2006. The only city — Deir al-Balah in the central part of the enclave. The only reason why it: less destroyed than the rest.

But "less destroyed" does not mean intact. In December 2024, Israeli forces carried out an airstrike on the Deir al-Balah city council building, killing then-mayor Diab al-Jaru and 10 employees while performing their duties. The strike occurred despite the city having the status of a "safe zone" designated by Israel itself.

Now there are new candidates in place of that council. Voting took place in 12 polling centers: stadiums, women's activity centers, former clinics. Some polling stations were set up in tents — schools are occupied by displaced persons.

Four lists without party banners

There are no formal parties in the elections. Candidates united mainly by tribal or professional affiliations. Four lists are competing: "Peace and Reconstruction," "Deir al-Balah Unites Us," "Future of Deir al-Balah," and "Rebirth of Deir al-Balah."

HAMAS officially boycotts the elections, citing disagreements with the Palestinian Administration — in particular the condition that candidates must accept a framework that includes recognition of Israel. At the same time, observers note: some of the lists are associated with people who sympathize with HAMAS, although the movement has not officially endorsed any.

"A citizen today is looking not for slogans, but for real solutions"

— Rabha al-Bhaisi, resident of Deir al-Balah, Al Jazeera

What stands behind one city

Some Palestinian analysts believe: the Palestinian Administration is using these elections to restore its presence in Gaza, counter HAMAS, and send a signal to the international community — Gaza remains politically connected to the West Bank within a single Palestinian structure.

Palestinians themselves perceive the vote as a symbol of national unity in the face of American proposals regarding Gaza, which many believe are aimed at deepening the rift between Gaza and the West Bank.

  • Approximately 70,000 voters had the right to vote — adults registered residents of the city.
  • Displaced persons temporarily staying in the city were not allowed to vote — only registered original residents.
  • Hundreds of observers from local and international organizations, dozens of journalists and approximately 675 members of electoral commissions were accredited for observation.

Organizers say: the elections are meant not only to restore local government, but also to help attract international funding and prove that democratic institutions are possible even during war.

If the vote in Deir al-Balah is recognized as successful, the Central Electoral Commission plans to expand this format to other cities in Gaza. But the real question is different: will the elected municipality have anything to rebuild — and will it not repeat the fate of its predecessor, destroyed in the "safe zone."

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026