Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Elections in Hungary: an anti-Ukrainian course or a chance for dialogue — what it means for Kyiv

On April 12, Hungarians elect their future government. The result will determine whether Budapest will retain political leverage in relations with the EU and Kyiv, or whether a window for constructive engagement will open — we examine the consequences.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Elections in Hungary: an anti-Ukrainian course or a chance for dialogue — what it means for Kyiv
Віктор Орбан (Фото: Olivier Matthys / EPA)

Why this matters for Ukraine

The elections in Hungary scheduled for April 12 could become a turning point for the first time in 16 years: either the preservation of Viktor Orbán's power with his openly antagonistic rhetoric toward Kyiv, or the arrival of the opposition "Tisa," which declares a reorientation toward the EU and NATO. For Ukraine this is not only a geopolitical symbol: it concerns practical mechanisms of pressure within the EU, the rights of the Hungarian minority in Zakarpattia, and diplomatic possibilities for the coming years.

Expert view

"The hostile narratives of the ruling party have constructed an image of Ukraine as an enemy that poses a threat to Hungary's security. These narratives were effective and persuasive, and public perception of Ukraine has significantly worsened in recent years."

— Richard Demeni, analyst at the Political Capital Institute (Budapest)

The source of the comment is an LIGA.net piece from Budapest. The analyst draws attention not only to rhetoric but also to the causal link: hostile narratives reinforce public support for policies that are then used as an instrument of foreign policy.

Scenario 1 — Fidesz victory

If the ruling party retains power, significant changes in relations with Kyiv are unlikely. Anti-Ukrainian rhetoric will very likely remain part of domestic politics, and the government will continue to use the Ukraine issue as a bargaining lever in relations with the EU — from financial mechanisms to political sanctions. For Ukraine, this would mean a continued risk of Brussels initiatives being blocked and additional political pressure on allies' positions.

Scenario 2 — Tisa victory

A transition to power by "Tisa" offers greater chances for de-escalation: the party has declared a reorientation toward the EU and NATO and a readiness to restore regional relations. According to Demeni, "Tisa" may seek diplomatic ways to resolve long-standing disputes over the rights of Hungarians in Zakarpattia. At the same time, this does not imply openly pro-Ukrainian sentiments: the party does not promise military aid and will set conditions regarding Kyiv's EU integration — including a national referendum vote.

What Kyiv should consider

A realistic approach is to prepare for both scenarios. If Fidesz retains power, Kyiv's task is to minimize Budapest's ability to block actions in the EU through active coordination with partners and transparent work on issues that raise concerns in Hungary. If "Tisa" comes to power, this creates a window for diplomatic negotiations on the rights of Hungarians in Zakarpattia and the removal of some veto grounds, but it does not guarantee military support.

Conclusion

The elections in Hungary are not only an internal matter for Budapest: they are a decision point that directly affects Ukraine's security and external support. Analysts agree that the most likely outcome will determine whether Hungary remains an external lever used for bargaining with the EU or becomes a partner with whom complex but necessary steps can be negotiated. Whether Kyiv can turn the potential political developments in Hungary into practical diplomatic results depends on the activity of Ukrainian diplomacy and the stance of European partners.

 

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026