Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

If Orbán Stays: EU Forced to Change How It Operates — What It Means for Ukraine

Reuters reports that EU institutions are preparing to review decision-making procedures in the event of Viktor Orbán's re-election. For Ukraine, this is a question of €90 billion, sanctions, and the pace of aid.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 27, 2026 · 2 min read

If Orbán Stays: EU Forced to Change How It Operates — What It Means for Ukraine
Віктор Орбан (Фото: Akos Kaiser/EPA)

Quiet agreements matter more than loud statements

According to Reuters, if Viktor Orbán retains power after the April 12 election, European Union institutions will be forced to change the way they operate. This is not just diplomatic rhetoric: it concerns the decision‑making mechanisms through which loans and sanctions — important for Ukraine's security — pass.

"That was the last straw that broke the camel's back. From our side, the hope of persuading Orbán has disappeared."

— a European diplomat (quote Reuters)

Why this is critical for Ukraine

Hungary has already blocked key decisions: in particular, the EU loan to Ukraine of €90 billion, much of which was intended for defense needs, remains under veto. In Brussels they hope that after a change of power Budapest will stop obstructing, but not everyone believes the Hungarian leadership's position will change quickly.

As Politico reports, Europeans are already preparing a "serious conversation" and possible steps in the event of Orbán's re‑election. LIGA.net explains that a change of government in Hungary could open the way to restoring EU unity on support for Ukraine.

"It seems that 'more of the same' is no longer an option for most EU countries."

— Krišjānis Kariņš, former prime minister of Latvia

What options the EU has

Analysts and diplomats describe three basic scenarios: 1) Orbán loses — and the blockades disappear or weaken; 2) Orbán wins — the EU tries to sideline Hungary in key processes; 3) gradual adaptation of procedures (including alternative financing channels) to reduce the influence of a single capital on critical decisions.

In any case the key question is the speed and reliability of funding. As emphasized by the Office of the President and by Volodymyr Zelenskyy himself, even if one EU member blocks, the "support coalition" must seek workarounds so as not to allow disruption of deliveries and defense projects.

"If Orbán stays, we'll have to change the way we work."

— a senior EU official (quote Reuters)

What Ukraine should do

This is not the time for illusions: regardless of the outcome of the Hungarian election, Ukraine needs to strengthen diversification of funding sources (bilateral agreements with partners, direct contracts, international financial institutions) and accelerate internal spending logistics so that every euro reaches the front quickly and transparently.

Framing for the reader: a delay of a single payment is not a political gesture in Brussels but a matter of body armor, ammunition and time to prepare a unit. That is why EU policy is a direct element of every Ukrainian's security.

Conclusion

The result of the Hungarian election will determine whether the traditional consensus in the EU returns, or whether institutions will seek new procedures to neutralize blocking. For Ukraine this means two clear tasks: speed up diversification of funding and convert political support from partners into signed contracts. Whether words can be turned into real money and weaponry is the question that will determine the pace of our defense.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026