Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Japan refuses to join European initiative on Russian assets

Tokyo refused to use about $30 billion of Russian assets frozen in Japan as a loan to Ukraine. The finance minister cites legal obstacles, but officials link the decision to the U.S. stance.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 9, 2025 · 1 min read

Japan refuses to join European initiative on Russian assets

Japan refused to support the EU initiative to use frozen Russian state assets to finance Ukraine. The decision was announced during a meeting of G7 finance ministers on Monday.

Tokyo's position

Japanese authorities said they cannot allocate roughly $30 billion of Russian assets frozen in the country to a loan for Ukraine. Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama said the main obstacle is legal issues. According to several unnamed officials, the real reason for the decision is tied to U.S. opposition to using those funds, and Tokyo does not want to disregard its important ally.

EU and G7 position

Seven EU countries believe that swift adoption of a decision on a "reparations loan" using frozen Russian assets would improve Kyiv's negotiating position on a peace agreement with Moscow.

EU countries are to take on individual guarantees to secure a loan to Ukraine of up to €210 billion; Germany must provide guarantees of up to €52 billion.

The G7 is ready to consider the possibility of confiscating all frozen Russian assets in order to achieve a just peace in Ukraine and end the war

– G7

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026