Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Yefremov received a Russian passport in December 2022 — what does this change in the treason case?

The "Skhemy" project discovered in Russian databases the passport and tax identification number of a former member of the Party of Regions. We examine why this complicates holding him accountable and what steps Ukraine and its partners can take.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Yefremov received a Russian passport in December 2022 — what does this change in the treason case?

In brief

Journalists from the "Schemes" project (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty) verified data from Russian registries and established that the former head of the Luhansk Regional State Administration and former leader of the Party of Regions faction, Oleksandr Yefremov, received a Russian passport on 22 December 2022. This detail has a direct impact on the ability of Ukrainian justice to hold him accountable.

What journalists found

According to the investigation, Yefremov left Ukraine at the start of the full-scale invasion via Slovakia. The Russian passport recorded in database leaks is the same document that was used to service an account at a Russian bank and to pay for services at the WorldClass fitness chain. The Russian Federal Tax Service also has an individual taxpayer number linked to this passport.

"On 22 December 2022 the politician received a Russian passport"

— The "Schemes" project (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty)

The Office of the Prosecutor General confirms that Yefremov faces charges in Ukraine, including treason and assisting in the seizure of administrative buildings in 2014, but the case is not complete: materials that were to be submitted to a court in government-controlled territory were lost due to the occupation, and the prosecution is seeking additional sources for copies.

"measures are being taken to find additional sources for obtaining copies of the lost materials"

— Office of the Prosecutor General

Journalistic materials also indicate that the Yefremov family owns real estate in Moscow worth about $4 million, and in November 2024 President Zelensky stripped Yefremov of state awards. The former MP himself did not respond to Schemes' requests and calls.

Why this matters for the case

Russian citizenship and actual location significantly complicate the ability of Ukrainian institutions to carry out procedural actions: interrogations, serving charges, extradition. When the accused has another citizenship and is located on the territory of the aggressor state, traditional justice mechanisms are blocked.

Verified registries are the key to international pressure. Public data about the passport and the tax number make the story verified before foreign partners and can become grounds for sanctions, asset freezes, and other legal steps abroad.

Practical consequences and options for action

Analysis of legal avenues shows several directions: intensifying informational and diplomatic pressure, international cooperation within sanctions and financial tracking, and searching for copies of evidence that disappeared during the temporary occupation. Achieving results requires not only open data but also coordination of the investigation with partners who can apply coercive instruments.

Summary

The discovery of the passport and tax number is an important factual step, but it does not automatically mean legal liability. The question is whether this data will be turned into systematic work: from searching for lost materials to international steps to seize assets and bring to justice. Whether the system is ready to do this will determine the outcome in this case.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026