Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Yermak heads lawyers' committee — what it means for reconstruction and compensation

The former head of the Office of the President returns to legal practice and will chair a committee that will oversee the legal framework for reconstruction, compensation, and European integration — and will do so on a voluntary, unpaid basis. We examine why this matters now.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 3, 2026 · 2 min read

Yermak heads lawyers' committee — what it means for reconstruction and compensation
Андрій Єрмак (Фото: Telegram ексглави ВП)

What happened

Former Head of the Office of the President Andriy Yermak has been appointed head of the newly created Committee on the Protection of Those Affected by Armed Aggression, Compensation Mechanisms, and Eurointegration Legal Support for Recovery at the National Association of Advocates. The announcement was posted on the association's website.

Why it matters

The committee is to focus on practical recovery mechanisms — from defining the rights of victims to providing legal support when applying for compensation and adapting Ukrainian law to EU standards. For victims, this issue is directly linked to compensation for damages and the possibility of regaining lost property.

Context and profile

Before entering public service, Yermak had about 25 years of legal practice. At the end of January 2026 it became known that he had reinstated his right to practice law after an almost six-year break. According to Ukrainska Pravda, on February 6 Yermak remains in Ukraine, is under enhanced security, and is holding private meetings with officials.

"The activities of members of committee councils, including the chairpersons, are carried out on a voluntary (unpaid) basis."

— National Association of Advocates of Ukraine

In addition to the committee chaired by Yermak, the association created three more sectoral committees: on legal support and the protection of rights in the field of mental health (chair — Hanna Ishchenko), on oil, gas and subsoil use (chair — Serhii Antonenko), and on mediation (chair — Luiza Romanadze). The goal is to strengthen the role of the Bar in the recovery process and to provide professional legal assistance to victims.

President Volodymyr Zelensky, commenting on Yermak's resignation as head of the Office of the President, said it was not connected to NABU searches, saying he had "his own reasons."

What next

The legal community notes that the involvement of a public figure with experience and contacts could speed up the coordination of compensation schemes and their harmonization with EU standards. At the same time, the key test is whether the stated goals will turn into practical tools for victims rather than formal declarations.

Interim conclusion: the creation of such committees is a logical step to consolidate expertise around recovery. But the effect will depend on the level of cooperation with state bodies, access to resources, and the transparency of procedures. Whether there will be enough political will and managerial capacity for this is a question for the coming months.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026