Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

EU Seeks Negotiator with Putin — But Merkel Already Refused, and Moscow Won't Accept the Rest

EU foreign ministers are gathering in Cyprus to choose a face for contacts with Russia. Each of the candidates has a problem that makes him unsuitable — either for the Kremlin or for Brussels.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 20, 2026 · 2 min read

EU Seeks Negotiator with Putin — But Merkel Already Refused, and Moscow Won't Accept the Rest
Ангела Меркель і Дональд Трамп, 2017 рік (Фото: EPA/Clemens Bilan)

The European Union wants to have its own negotiator with Russia — and the reason is simple: fear of being left out if the US and Moscow reach an agreement on Ukraine's future without Europe's participation. This is what Financial Times writes, citing EU officials.

A list with no winner

According to FT and Politico, at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Cyprus next week, four candidates will be discussed: former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, former president of the European Central Bank and former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, current Finnish President Alexander Stubb, and his predecessor Sauli Niinistö.

But even before the meeting, the list has effectively been shortened. Merkel publicly refused: at a forum of the WDR television channel, she stated that negotiations with Russia should be conducted by those currently in power and bearing responsibility — not former leaders.

«Her previous failed mediation attempts are viewed by many in Europe as sufficient grounds for refusal»

Politico, citing diplomatic sources

Why each candidate is a problem

  • Merkel — refused personally, and her reputation after "Minsk" and "Nord Stream" is discredited in the eyes of part of Europe.
  • Stubb — current president of a NATO country; Finland's membership in the Alliance reduces his acceptability to Moscow.
  • Kaja Kallas — the EU's chief diplomat put forward her own candidacy, however, according to Politico citing three diplomats, her rigid anti-Russian position makes dialogue impossible: "Unfortunately, she has excluded herself from this list," said one senior EU diplomat.
  • Draghi — according to the same sources, "enjoys respect in Europe and is not perceived as either a hawk or a Kremlin sympathizer," but does not yet have a mandate.

Form without substance

The key problem is not the name, but the authority. No public document exists yet detailing the negotiator's mandate, the mechanism of his accountability, or the limits of what he can promise on behalf of 27 countries. A negotiator without a mandate is not a diplomat, but a messenger with a blank letter.

The Kremlin has already responded in characteristic style: spokesman Peskov called the EU's search "irrelevant," and hinted to Kallas that she herself should not aspire to this role.

What's next

The Cyprus meeting will take place after both Washington and Kyiv supported the idea of a separate European channel with Moscow. But supporting an idea is not the same as agreeing on a specific person with specific powers.

If ministers in Cyprus agree on Draghi or Stubb, but do not give the negotiator a clear mandate from all 27 states — will Putin agree to sit down at the table at all, or will he use the very ambiguity as a pretext to drag out the process?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026