Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zaluzhnyi explained how the war in Ukraine could end

Former commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valerii Zaluzhnyi said the war could end without a victory or defeat for either side. He stressed that a long-term cessation of the war could give Ukraine a chance for reforms, recovery and economic growth.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

November 30, 2025 · 2 min read

Zaluzhnyi explained how the war in Ukraine could end

Russia's war against Ukraine may end without a victory or defeat for either country. This was stated in an exclusive column for LIGA.net by the former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ukraine's ambassador to the United Kingdom, Valerii Zaluzhnyi.

"It is very strange when the question of ending the war, under the pressure of yet another media hook, becomes the subject for yet another set of soothsayers in Ukraine."

– he notes.

Factors in ending the war

The former commander-in-chief believes that informational prompts alone are clearly insufficient to determine the timing of the war's end.

The end or halt of the war, especially one of attrition, will depend on a combination of gains or losses on the military, economic and political fronts, Zaluzhnyi noted, adding that a collapse on one of those fronts "may only create the preconditions for its end."

"However, the durability of the entire structure absolutely depends on the resilience and potential of the others. For example, a peace in Ukraine that is so quickly predicted would raise rather harsh questions in Russia about the number of human losses – this will be as difficult to explain as explaining corruption in Ukraine today. And it is natural that the situation on the political front in Russia will not allow this without significant concessions or our complete defeat."

– the former military officer explains.

He adds that it is currently difficult to say whether the mediators trying to "sketch scenarios" for Ukraine understand this.

"But the fact that each time the conditions do not become better for Ukraine is obvious."

– Zaluzhnyi emphasized.

Different options for ending the war

According to Zaluzhnyi, when forming the political objective of the war it is important to remember that it does not always end with one side's victory and the other's defeat: the vast majority of wars end either in mutual defeat, or with each side convinced of its victory, or in other variants.

"So, when we speak about victory, we must say frankly: victory is the collapse of the Russian empire, and defeat is the complete occupation of Ukraine through its disintegration. Everything else is simply a continuation of the war."

– the ex-commander-in-chief states.

Possibilities for a long-term cessation of the war

Although Ukrainians, of course, strive for a full victory — the collapse of the Russian empire — they cannot rule out the option of a long-term, years-long, cessation of the war, since "this is a very common way wars have ended in history," the former military man emphasizes.

He believes: peace, even one that exists in anticipation of the next war, gives a chance for political change, deep reforms, full-scale recovery, economic growth and the return of citizens.

"One can even speak of the beginning of building a safe, maximally protected state thanks to innovations and technologies. The formation and strengthening of the foundations of a just state through the fight against corruption and the creation of a fair judiciary. The country's economic development, in particular based on international economic recovery programs."

– Zaluzhnyi explains.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026