Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Illness and a shortfall of votes: why the Rada didn't start the plenary session and what it means

Parliament's work on February 12 did not start due to a lack of votes. The reasons — from reports of mass illnesses to simple faction logistics — will have consequences for decision‑making during wartime.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Illness and a shortfall of votes: why the Rada didn't start the plenary session and what it means
Верховна Рада (Фото: пресслужба Ради)

What happened

The Verkhovna Rada was unable to start its plenary session on 12 February due to a lack of votes: several attempts at signal voting produced no result, so the first deputy speaker of the parliament announced a recess. The proceedings were broadcast on the Rada channel.

"Consideration of the agenda items for today is finished. Thank you all for your unproductive work. I wish health to everyone who, for these reasons, could not arrive today — get well."

— Oleksandr Kornienko, first deputy speaker of the Verkhovna Rada

Possible causes

Ukrainska Pravda (UP), citing unnamed informed sources, and a number of Telegram channels reported a possible mass food poisoning, allegedly in the parliament canteen. MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak confirms part of the reports about people falling ill, but notes that the number of cases is small and many deputies were on trips.

"They say it's some virus or poisoning. It's not clear yet. I don't think it's the canteen — few MPs go there. Very different people got sick. It's hard to understand what unites them, what the common source of the illness is."

— Oleksandr Merezhko, head of the Verkhovna Rada committee on foreign policy and interparliamentary cooperation

What this means for the parliament's work and security

These questions are more important than they may seem at first glance. In wartime, even one day of unproductive sessions can delay ratifications, budget decisions, or steps related to support for the military and partners. According to Zheleznyak, the day's agenda mostly consisted of ratifications, so the shortfall of votes was predictable.

Context: the day before, on 11 February, the Rada raised the maximum age for civil servants by five years, adopted a one-year deferment for some contract servicemen, and established a nationwide minute of silence at 09:00. The next plenary week will begin on 24 February.

Brief conclusion

While checks into the causes of the illnesses continue, the parliament needs to ensure both technical and organizational resilience: from quorum management to medical procedures in the building. Political and medical sources are continuing to investigate the circumstances.

This is a test of institutional reliability under increased strain. The practical steps taken by the parliament's leadership and factions — regarding registration of MPs, logistics, and health protection — will determine how quickly critically important decisions are made in the coming weeks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026