Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Outdated Drone Is Not Junk: How Ukraine Can Monetize What No Longer Strikes Russia

# Budanov Names Specific Weapon Categories Suitable for Sale at Defense Tech Export Forum Budanov at the Defense Tech Export Forum named specific categories of weapons suitable for sale: surplus marine drones and early-model FPV drones that frontline forces have outgrown. Behind this lies harsh logic — either find a market now or lose it forever.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Outdated Drone Is Not Junk: How Ukraine Can Monetize What No Longer Strikes Russia
Кирило Буданов (Фото: EPA)

Head of the Presidential Office Kyrylo Budanov spoke at the Defense Tech Export Forum with a thesis that the Ukrainian defense sector prefers not to voice aloud: some domestic weapons have already become outdated for the front line — but are entirely competitive on the global market.

«Free weapons sales under conditions of active warfare are impossible. Neither our soldiers on the front lines nor our Western partners, from whom we are requesting arms ourselves, understand this. I believe that only what exists in sufficient surplus can be freely sold, for example, maritime drones».

Kyrylo Budanov, Defense Tech Export Forum

Along with maritime drones, he named early FPV models — first-generation unmanned aerial vehicles that Ukraine has already outgrown technologically. For comparison: if monthly FPV production was 20,000 units at the beginning of 2024, by 2025 capacity grew to 200,000 per month. The front has moved on to newer solutions — old models are gathering dust in warehouses.

Why the «window» might close

Budanov does not hide the pragmatism: some Ukrainian manufacturers are already cutting staff due to lack of domestic demand. Meanwhile, in the Middle East — particularly among Persian Gulf monarchies — there is demand for battle-tested technologies. Ukraine has already held negotiations with regional leaders about 10-year defense agreements.

The problem is that the niche does not wait. According to Budanov, «by losing markets, we are taking a huge risk of never entering them again, because others will». In other words, a pause during wartime is not a frozen position, but its actual surrender to competitors: Turkey, Iran, China, which are actively promoting their own UAVs.

A brand that is hard to sell cautiously

Budanov characterized Ukrainian technologies as a «global brand» — and this is no exaggeration. Ukraine produces approximately 4 million drones per year, more than any NATO country. But a brand built on combat experience requires active market presence — not merely participation in forums.

  • Maritime drones — the most export-ready category: surplus production is confirmed, combat effectiveness proven in the Black Sea.
  • Early FPV models — inexpensive (from $300 to $500 per unit), simple to master, suitable for armies without developed drone culture.
  • Long-range UAVs — the most sensitive category: any contract will require coordination with partners who still supply components to Ukraine.

It is precisely this last point — the main uncomfortable variable. Ukraine still depends on imported electronics in its own drones. By selling technology, it effectively re-exports partners' components — without their explicit approval, this is legally and politically risky.

If Kyiv truly has a «window of opportunity» in the Middle Eastern and African markets — the question is not whether to sell, but whether the government will manage to coordinate a re-export control mechanism with partners before this window is taken by Ankara or Beijing.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026