Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Deputy commander from Sumy region to stand trial for staging an execution and a beating — a signal to the army

The State Bureau of Investigation has completed an investigation into an officer who intimidated and brutally beat subordinates after they publicized a recording of his threats. This is a case about power, control and responsibility within the internal life of the military — and it is important for discipline during wartime.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 21, 2026 · 2 min read

Deputy commander from Sumy region to stand trial for staging an execution and a beating — a signal to the army

Briefly

The State Bureau of Investigation (DBR) reported the completion of an investigation into the deputy commander of one of the battalions stationed in the Sumy region. According to the investigation, the officer simulated an execution, beat subordinates, deliberately shot one of them in the foot, and tried to have the wound recorded as "self-inflicted." An indictment has already been sent to court — the suspect faces up to 12 years in prison.

What happened

The incident began after two servicemen recorded a conversation with the officer in which he threatened to execute them if orders were not followed. One of the recordings was posted on social media — after that, according to the DBR, the commander deliberately persecuted his subordinates.

The investigation identified several episodes of violence: the officer lined up soldiers, took his service pistol and fired five times at their feet and over their heads, simulating an execution; struck several fighters with a helmet (one has a torn meniscus and a deformed helmet); ordered a rifle to be brought, shot the phone from which the video was uploaded; and deliberately shot one of the victims in the foot. Another episode concerns the beating of a different deputy commander during a work-related conflict.

"According to the State Bureau of Investigation, the officer simulated an execution, used physical violence, and tried to force subordinates to delete the video and apologize publicly."

— State Bureau of Investigation

Charges and consequences

The officer is charged with torture, violation of statutory rules governing relations between servicemen, and exceeding authority. He is currently in custody, and the materials have been sent to court. The outcome of the trial will show whether control mechanisms work and whether society will feel real accountability within the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Context: are these cases isolated?

This case did not remain isolated in the information space: in October there were reports about exposing a commander who forced subordinates to do work in the Lviv region, and in November — about a lieutenant colonel beating a man liable for military service in the Pre-Carpathian region with serious consequences. Similar incidents undermine trust in the command staff and distract from the main goal — the effective defense of the country.

Analysts and lawyers point out that during wartime, discipline and trust between people must be a priority. Systemic problems in motivation, oversight, and commanders' accountability create opportunities for abuse if institutions do not respond.

What’s next

Cases like this are a test for the system: whether military justice and law enforcement agencies can ensure a transparent investigation and a fair trial. Transparent decisions will strengthen discipline and send a signal to potential abusers: there is no place in the ranks of the army for terrorizing subordinates.

Question to consider

Will these high-profile cases turn into consistent reforms of control and accountability in the army — or remain isolated exceptions? The answer will determine how strong the internal discipline necessary for the defense of the state will be.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026