Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky: For security, a concrete EU accession date is needed — Moscow may sabotage the process

The President says Ukraine is technically ready by 2027, but without a fixed date in the peace plan there is a risk of political sabotage by the Kremlin via third parties. Why this matters now and how it affects diplomacy and security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky: For security, a concrete EU accession date is needed — Moscow may sabotage the process

The president’s position: a date as a security guarantee

President Volodymyr Zelensky at a briefing on 6 February (LIGA.net correspondent) said that Ukraine could technically be ready to join the EU as early as 2027. However, in his view, without a specific date in the peace plan there is a risk that Moscow will try to stop integration not directly, but through third parties.

"I have already said that we will technically be ready [to join the EU] by 2027... And you must understand us. You are talking about the end of the war and simultaneous security guarantees. And the EU for us is security guarantees."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Why a date is needed

According to Zelensky, a political declaration by itself risks being insufficient: a clear commitment is needed in the peace plan, signed by all parties. In Washington, he said, they believe Russia will not oppose Ukraine’s European integration — this is enshrined in a 20-point peace plan. But the president emphasizes: he does not believe that opposition will not occur, because in practice the risk is realized through other actors.

Geopolitical obstacles

The key obstacle within the EU is the resistance of individual countries. The text mentions Hungary and its prime minister Viktor Orbán, whose position periodically blocks the process. Bloomberg in August 2025 wrote that the American leader phoned Orbán after talks with Zelensky and European leaders to discuss the blocking. An additional complication is the domestic political context in the United States: on 5 February 2026 Donald Trump expressed support for Orbán in upcoming elections. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on 29 January that accelerated accession of Ukraine to the EU is not possible — another signal that the issue will require intensive diplomacy.

What this means for Ukraine and its partners

Zelensky’s framing is to turn European integration from a symbolic goal into a legally enshrined element of a peace plan that would oblige signatories to politically counter blockades. That changes the game: instead of only long negotiations about standards, it becomes a matter of international political responsibility. In the president’s logic, the U.S. must work with individual EU members to reduce the risk of a veto; this is political work that often happens behind the scenes but determines the outcome.

Summary

Ukraine is proposing concrete terms — a date as an element of security. That does not automatically guarantee accession, but it creates international obligations against sabotage. Now the key question is whether partners will agree to legalize that date in the peace plan and whether they will have the political will to confront internal and external blocks.

"And I, as President of Ukraine, say that I don't believe Russia won't try to stop our movement into the EU... because there is a practice of not doing it with one's own hands but through other actors — and we all understand which actors those are."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Sources: LIGA.net (Zelensky briefing, 6 February), Bloomberg (reference to phone contacts, August 2025), public statements of Friedrich Merz (29 January) and media reports on leaders' positions.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026