Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky offered Trump 30–50-year guarantees — what it means for Ukraine's security

The President asked to replace the 15-year formula with a longer term during a closed-door meeting with Donald Trump. If Washington backs the idea, it could change the mechanics of Ukraine's long-term security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 29, 2025 · 1 min read

Zelensky offered Trump 30–50-year guarantees — what it means for Ukraine's security

In the Room Where Security Is Decided

In high diplomacy, loud statements matter less than quiet agreements. During a closed meeting on December 28 that lasted more than two hours, Volodymyr Zelensky offered Donald Trump security guarantees for Ukraine for a period of 30–50 years instead of the current 15, with an option to extend. According to the president, Trump "will think" — no concrete decisions were announced after the talks.

What was discussed

According to the Office of the President, the documents currently provide for 15 years of guarantees with an option to extend. Zelensky emphasized that the Russian‑Ukrainian war has been going on for almost 15 years, so a longer term — 30, 40 or 50 years — is needed to create a real system of deterrence and stability.

"I told him that we already have a war — and it has been going on for almost 15 years. And therefore I would very much like the guarantees to be longer. I told him that we would very much like to consider the possibility of 30‑40‑50 years. And then it would be a historic decision by President Trump. The President said he would think."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Why 30–50 Years Matter

Longer guarantees are not just symbolic. They can serve as a long-term deterrent tool, increase investor confidence, and change an opponent's military‑political calculations. For Ukraine, it's about security at the level of generations, not a temporary solution.

What's next

After the meeting, the parties held phone talks with European leaders and spoke to the media; the diplomatic process will continue. The initiative requires turning political will into legal mechanisms — and that is a matter for Washington, Congress and allies.

Whether partners are ready to turn declarations into long-term commitments is the key question for the coming months.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026