Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky imposes sanctions on 66 individuals and 62 companies — a blow to crypto chains and missile suppliers

After a massive attack on the energy system, the president signed two decrees intended to cut off revenue streams and supply channels for the Russian war machine. We examine exactly what was restricted and why it matters for Ukraine’s security.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 8, 2026 · 3 min read

Zelensky imposes sanctions on 66 individuals and 62 companies — a blow to crypto chains and missile suppliers

Briefly: what was done

On 8 February President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed two decrees implementing decisions of the National Security and Defense Council. According to the Office of the President, the restrictions affected 66 individuals and 62 legal entities. These measures are aimed at disrupting supply chains and financial channels that support the Russian military-industrial complex and sanction-evasion mechanisms.

What’s in each decree

Decree No. 102/2026 focuses on enterprises and individuals supplying components for missiles and drones: the list includes 24 individuals and 27 companies. Among them are firms from Hong Kong, a branch of a Russian bank in Shanghai, and a number of Chinese enterprises through which critical components were routed.

Decree No. 103/2026 targets financial infrastructure and those who facilitate sanction evasion: 42 individuals and 35 legal entities. In addition to Russian citizens, the list includes actors from Kyrgyzstan, the UAE, Georgia and Panama.

Target: the crypto ecosystem and mining

Among the sanctioned are the cryptocurrency network ecosystem A7 and related settlement operators, crypto exchangers and cryptocurrency holders. According to the Office of the President, supplies of components for missile production were paid for through this network.

"The cryptocurrency network ecosystem A7 has been sanctioned, through which, in particular, payments were made for supplies of components for the production of Russian missiles."

— Office of the President of Ukraine

Context: the attack and the response

The decision followed a massive overnight attack on 7 February, when Russia used more than 400 drones and nearly 40 cruise missiles, striking substations and thermal power plants in western regions. As the prime minister reported, damaged facilities included substations, overhead power lines, as well as the Burshtyn and Dobrotvir thermal power plants.

"Substations and overhead lines were hit, as well as the Burshtyn and Dobrotvir thermal power plants."

— Denys Shmyhal, Prime Minister of Ukraine

Why this can work

The logic of such sanctions is simple and rational: cutting off critical components and financial flows slows ammunition production and raises the cost of finding workarounds. Working simultaneously on the financial and technological fronts amplifies the effect: even if individual links survive, the overall cost and risk of logistics for the aggressor increase.

The Ukrainian initiative is also being coordinated with partners: part of these measures is expected to be included in the EU’s 20th sanctions package, which, according to the Office of the President, is being prepared for adoption at the end of February. This means increased international pressure and better enforcement mechanisms.

What’s next

The effectiveness of the sanctions will depend on two factors: rapid implementation (freezing accounts, blocking transactions, shutting down access) and international coordination — especially with jurisdictions through which evasion channels run. Analysts at Ukrainian and Western centers note that combined actions on the financial and technological levels are among the most effective tools of pressure in the context of protracted aggression.

Conclusion

These decrees are not a one-off act of retribution, but an element of a strategy: to limit the enemy’s resources, complicate its logistics and force it to pay more to wage war. The key now is to turn political statements into sustained international cooperation and technical transaction controls. Whether this will significantly reduce the pace of missile and UAV production depends on the speed and effectiveness of sanction enforcement, and on the response of partners.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026