Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky Briefed by Malyuk and Approves Asymmetric Operations — What It Means for Ukraine's Security

The President heard reports from the former head of the SBU and the acting head of the service, confirmed resource support and approved new combat measures. We examine why this matters for the front lines and for diplomacy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky Briefed by Malyuk and Approves Asymmetric Operations — What It Means for Ukraine's Security

What happened

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy held meetings with the former head of the SBU (Security Service of Ukraine), Vasyl Malyuk, who "continues to work in the agency," and with the acting head of the SBU, Yevhen Khmara. According to the head of state, reports were heard and new combat operations were approved.

"Report from Vasyl Malyuk. We continue preparing our asymmetric operations against Russia"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

"The internal transformation of the Service continues as well — precisely so as to strengthen our state"

— Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

In addition, the SBU's first deputy head Poklad reported the capture of an occupier suspected of executing Ukrainian prisoners of war in the Kursk region — this was also discussed during the meeting.

Why it matters

Asymmetric operations are not only high-profile actions; they are a set of measures aimed at undermining an opponent's logistics, arms infrastructure and ability to operate without security intervention. For the reader, this means the state is focusing on measures that can produce effects with relatively lower resource expenditure and in a shorter time frame.

The statement that the SBU and other agencies are "fully resourced" is a two-level signal: internal (support for operations) and external (strengthening positions in talks with partners and deterring the enemy).

Consequences and risks

Approval of new operations increases effectiveness at the front, but may heighten geopolitical tension. Security analysts note that such decisions require high coordination with defense and diplomatic instruments to avoid risks to civilian infrastructure or escalation directed at Ukraine.

What next?

It is now important to monitor two vectors: how these operations will affect the operational situation at the front and how partners will respond in the form of additional support or diplomatic steps. This is a moment when declarations must turn into concrete resources and procedures.

Without unnecessary pomposity: the decision shows that leadership is betting on a combination of intelligence, operational action and internal transformation of the services — part of our strategic advantage will depend on this.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026