Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky dismisses Yermak amid sweeping corruption probe

President Volodymyr Zelensky dismissed Head of the Presidential Office Andriy Yermak amid an anti-corruption investigation. NABU conducted searches at Yermak's residence; he was the country's second-most powerful person and a key negotiator with the West.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

November 28, 2025 · 2 min read

Zelensky dismisses Yermak amid sweeping corruption probe

President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday dismissed his chief adviser Andriy Yermak amid an unfolding anti-corruption investigation. Politico reported.

Yermak had for years been at the president’s side as the second most influential person in Kyiv and a key representative in negotiations with Ukraine’s Western allies during the defense against Russia’s full-scale invasion.

"I am grateful to Andriy for always presenting the Ukrainian position on the negotiation track exactly as it should be. It was always a patriotic position. But I want there to be no rumors and speculation."

– Zelensky said.

Soon after, the president published a decree dismissing Yermak a few hours after Ukraine’s anti-corruption agency conducted a search at the senior official’s residence.

Searches by NABU

"The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) are conducting investigative searches in the premises of the Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine."

– NABU reported on Facebook.

Earlier this month Ukrainian MPs and oversight bodies called on Zelensky to dismiss Yermak amid an energy corruption scandal worth $100 million being investigated by NABU. One of the president’s business partners, who fled the country, is accused of being the main organizer of the scheme.

"The investigative actions are authorized and are being carried out as part of the ongoing investigation."

– the bureau added regarding the searches at Yermak’s, promising to provide more details soon.

Yermak confirmed the searches.

"Today NABU and SAPO are indeed carrying out procedural actions in my home. The investigators face no obstacles. They have been given full access to the apartment, my lawyers are on site and are interacting with law enforcement."

– he wrote on Telegram.

Attempts to weaken anti-corruption bodies

This summer the Zelensky Office and parliament in Kyiv sought to strip NABU and SAPO of their independence and place them under a politically appointed prosecutor general.

The move, which coincided with signs that oversight bodies had targeted the president’s inner circle, sparked the first large anti-government street protests since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. After the EU also called for the decision to be reviewed, Zelensky changed course.

Major corruption scandal

Two weeks ago anti-corruption agencies dismantled a criminal organization composed of current and former energy officials, a well-known businessman, government ministers and a former deputy prime minister.

The investigation has grown into the most damaging domestic scandal of Zelensky’s time in office. It comes amid relentless Russian bombardment and pressure from the United States on Kyiv to agree to a potentially unfavorable peace deal with the Kremlin.

Further talks

On Friday evening Zelensky said Ukraine continues preparing for talks with the United States, and it will be represented by the Chief of the General Staff, representatives of the Foreign Ministry and intelligence services.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026