Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky: negotiations are needed, but pressure must be on Russia — what this means for sanctions and the front

In an interview with Politico, the president rejected Russia's demand to withdraw its troops from the Donbas and urged that sanctions against Moscow not be eased. We analyze why this is crucial for Ukraine's security and energy stability.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 12, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky: negotiations are needed, but pressure must be on Russia — what this means for sanctions and the front
Володимир Зеленський (Фото: ОП)

President's position — in brief

In an interview with Politico, Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated that he supports negotiations but insisted that international pressure should be directed at Russia, not Kyiv. This is not rhetoric but an attempt to clearly reorient the diplomatic debate: exchanges of statements should turn into pressure on the aggressor that forces it to change its behavior.

"So, of course, we need negotiations, we support them <…> This is not about trusting Putin, we do not trust Russia, but I think, and I believe, that the Americans really want to end this war. I hope they will help us, but we need greater pressure on Russia, not on me"

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine (interview with Politico)

Why troop withdrawal is a threat

Zelensky rejected Russia's demand for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donbas. According to him, this would create strong defensive positions for the adversary and boost its morale — in other words, shift the balance of power in Russia's favor. The argument follows simple logic: territorial concessions amid an unresolved conflict often mean strategic losses in the future.

Sanctions and energy: a double impact

The president also expressed concern about a possible weakening of sanctions against Russia, a subject of discussion among Western partners. This issue touches directly on Ukraine's security: sanctions are the main tool for deterring the aggressor, and their easing could reduce the leverage for diplomatic pressure.

At the same time, the energy situation has intensified: LIGA.net explained why fuel prices rose and under what conditions a shortage is possible. Rising energy costs hit household budgets and the logistics of supplying the front — so decisions on sanctions and energy exemptions must be considered with the real risks to Ukraine in mind.

Negotiations calendar

The trilateral talks between Ukraine, the US and Russia, scheduled for early March, were postponed due to operations and regional tensions related to incidents involving Iran. According to Zelensky, the next round could take place roughly between March 16 and 22 — potential locations: Switzerland or Turkey.

What's next — brief analysis

Effective talks will require two things: first, a clear position from partners regarding sanctions — without this Russia will have fewer incentives to make concessions; second, maintaining Ukraine's defensive posture so that diplomatic steps do not turn into tactical losses on the battlefield. Experts agree that it is precisely the combination of diplomatic pressure and defensive resilience that offers the best chance to change the aggressor's behavior.

Now it's up to the partners: will they have enough political will, and will statements turn into concrete instruments of pressure that protect Ukraine's interests — from security on the front to stability in the energy market?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026