Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky on Belarus and the EU: What It Means for Ukraine's Security and Economy

The President, in a wide-ranging interview with "Dzerkalo," outlined his vision of Belarus’s role in Europe, the conditions for peaceful coexistence, and Kyiv’s concrete steps on security and sanctions — we examine the implications for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 23, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky on Belarus and the EU: What It Means for Ukraine's Security and Economy
Володимир Зеленський (Фото: ОП)

Context and main idea

In an interview with the Belarusian independent media outlet «Dzerkalo», President Volodymyr Zelensky said he sees Belarus’s future in the European Union and seeks peaceful relations between the countries. This is a position that combines a political perspective (European integration) with pragmatic security conditions for Ukraine.

Why this matters for Ukrainians

Belarus joining the EU would mean more than economic changes — it would reshape the region’s geopolitical map, reduce the risk of Belarusian territory being used against Ukraine, and strengthen Belarusian statehood. That is why Kyiv’s stance is not emotional but practical: border security, control over relay stations for strike systems, and legal mechanisms of accountability.

What Zelensky said — key messages

"I would very much like the war to end and for something to change in the relations between our countries. After all, the Belarusian people did not start a war against Ukraine. I think that this is the wisest choice or status for Belarusians to remain in."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

He emphasized that membership in the EU is a Belarusian choice and that the propaganda operating in the country for years sends one-sided signals about economic risks. Zelensky stressed that Ukraine is ready to respect Belarus’s independence provided it has free leadership that respects citizens’ rights and the independence of our state.

Specific statements on security and accountability

The president hinted at operational responses — referring to disabling 3–4 'Shahed' relay stations in Belarus. He also questioned the impunity of certain sites: in Zelensky’s view, NATO should consider «Oreshnik» a legitimate target in case of escalation.

Kyiv also plans to expand sanctions against the Lukashenko regime — in particular, targeting his sons and close associates. According to the president, this should be accompanied by presenting evidence of Belarus’s involvement in aggression to convince partners of the need for such steps.

What’s next — possible consequences

First, Zelensky’s position is aimed at creating a political framework for partners’ future actions: from increased sanctions pressure to coordination of intelligence. Second, if the West receives convincing proof of Belarus’s participation in military actions against Ukraine, it could accelerate the expansion of the "blacklist" for the regime’s inner circle and change approaches to defense planning in the region.

Brief conclusion

The statement combines a long-term ambition (Belarus’s European integration) with short-term security measures. For a Ukrainian reader this means: on one hand — a chance to stabilize the region through a neighbor’s European orientation; on the other — a need for strengthened cooperation with partners to turn theses into concrete defensive tools.

The key question now is whether Europe will support the political and legal steps that would allow these words to be transformed into real changes in security and accountability. And how quickly Kyiv and its allies can convince the international community of the need for concrete action?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026