Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky: Russia seeks to profit from oil — how Ukraine and its partners are pressing the "shadow fleet"

The President explained why rising oil prices do not automatically translate into unpunished exports for Russia — and which tools Ukraine and its allies are already using.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 3, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky: Russia seeks to profit from oil — how Ukraine and its partners are pressing the "shadow fleet"
Володимир Зеленський (Фото: ANDREW KRAVCHENKO / EPA)

Context: why this matters now

After the jump in oil prices amid the US-Israeli operation against Iran, there is a real temptation for Russia to increase export revenues. However, as the president noted, this does not mean such exports will go unanswered. For Ukraine and its partners the issue is not only economic but also a security one: who controls the routes, who insures the cargo, and whether sanctions are effective.

What the president said

"It [Russia] wants to earn more amid this crisis and will certainly try to take advantage of the price increase. But there are various measures that can reduce their export capabilities."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

"Not all, of course — it's very difficult to do — but with most tankers it is possible to work this way. This is probably the only option at the moment."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine

Pressure tools: from strikes to ship arrests

The president named two key channels of influence: Ukrainian long-range strikes, which reduce logistical capabilities, and partners' actions to detain tankers and impose sanctions. This combination of tactical and legal measures is exactly what can keep volumes of illegal exports under control.

According to media and diplomatic sources, among the instruments are ship arrests, financial sanctions against owners and operators, blocking shipments by refusing insurance and port access. Examples in the field include recent actions by European countries:

  • On 17 February France released a "shadow" tanker after three weeks of detention and the payment of a multimillion fine.
  • On 1 March Belgium for the first time detained an oil tanker linked to the shadow fleet.

Analysts and diplomats note that such practices are expanding: this work is being carried out not only at the level of sanctions, but also through the practical blocking of logistics and shipping.

Authoritative signals from abroad

According to LIGA.net, US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Vitaker said that countering the "shadow fleet" combined with long-range capabilities affects Russian exports. Separately, Washington officials also spoke about intentions to mitigate the impact on global energy prices — that is, to combine strategic pressure with measures to stabilize the market.

What this means for Ukraine and the world

First, rising prices do not make shadow exports invulnerable: international coordination provides instruments of influence. Second, success depends on partners' readiness to provide political and legal support — from investigations into shipowners to sanctions against insurers and shipping companies.

Ukraine adds a tactical element to this system — with its strikes and intelligence — but without transforming declarations into concrete control mechanisms at ports, banks and insurers the pressure will be incomplete.

Summary

The situation shows that oil prices and the fight against illegal exports are connected but not identical. The question is one of political will and coordination: will there be enough to systematically limit Russia's revenues from the "shadow fleet" and minimize the hit to the global energy market?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026