Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky: Russia's army has stopped growing — losses offset mobilization, Moscow on the brink of crisis

Interview with Corriere della Sera: the president says the plan to mobilize 400,000 cannot offset monthly losses. Why this matters for spring offensives, the front and international diplomacy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 3, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky: Russia's army has stopped growing — losses offset mobilization, Moscow on the brink of crisis
Володимир Зеленський (Фото: Офіс президента)

Briefly

In an extensive interview with the Italian Corriere della Sera, Volodymyr Zelensky said that the Kremlin plans a mobilization of 400,000 people, but in practice the Russian army has stopped growing: monthly losses equal the inflows of recruits. If this dynamic persists, Moscow faces systemic risks that will affect both tactics and its negotiating position.

What Zelensky said

"We are diversifying the forms of warfare that allow us to resist. We are not losing, and Russia is still dissatisfied. They are losing a lot of people – up to 35,000 a month. That is a gigantic number."

— Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine (interview with Corriere della Sera)

The president added that, in his view, Putin's mobilization does not change the fundamental problem — losses almost equal personnel replenishment, and that is why the Russian army is "close to crisis."

Analysis: why this matters

If losses at divisional rates are eating up the inflow of new soldiers, the army loses not only numbers but quality: experienced units do not have time to restore combat readiness, commanders lose skills, logistics and morale face additional strain. This explains why Ukraine is betting on technical means — drones, artillery, anti-tank systems — to compensate for the shortage of people and to increase defensive effectiveness.

Context and confirmation

  • The claim about a planned mobilization of 400,000 people appears in the interview; this figure has already featured in Western assessments as an indicator of the scale the Kremlin is aiming for.
  • Earlier the president cited other quantitative estimates as benchmarks for losses: for example, up to 35,000 per month (in his words) and earlier public comparisons of losses and territory.

Implications for the front and diplomacy

The tactical takeaway is simple: Moscow may continue to attempt spring offensives, but with stagnating replenishment such operations risk repeating previous failures. The strategic takeaway is more complex: a reduced offensive potential increases the role of diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions, and also the need for operational support from partners — weapons, ammunition, intelligence and logistics.

What this means for Ukrainians and partners

For Ukraine this confirms two realities: first, the war still requires a high mobilization of resources — not only people but also industrial capacity; second, strategic advantage can be gained through technological and material rearmament. Partners should turn rhetorical support into concrete deliveries that will strengthen Ukraine's ability to endure and prevail in the long term.

Summary

Zelensky's remarks to Corriere della Sera paint a picture in which human losses make the Russian army numerically stable but strategically exhausted. This is not a guarantee of a quick victory, but it creates a window of opportunity: who best uses it depends on how quickly partners turn words into real assistance and how effectively the Ukrainian military turns resources into concrete combat-capable results.

Going forward — events on the front and the actions of international partners will decide: can Moscow find ways to restore army growth, or will its resources continue to be depleted in assaults without sustained strategic success?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026