Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Zelensky resumes direct dialogue with former foreign ministers after Yermak’s resignation — what will change in foreign policy

A change in leadership at the Presidential Office has opened the president’s access to influential diplomats. We examine which topics are at the center of the talks, who is behind these contacts, and why this matters for Ukraine’s security and international standing.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Zelensky resumes direct dialogue with former foreign ministers after Yermak’s resignation — what will change in foreign policy
Президент Володимир Зеленський на зустрічі з ексміністром закордонних справ Дмитром Кулебою, Київ, 15 січня 2026 року (Фото: Telegram-канал Володимира Зеленського)

In high diplomacy, quiet agreements matter more than loud statements

The removal of Andriy Yermak from the position of head of the Office of the President gave Volodymyr Zelensky the opportunity to restore direct contacts with former foreign ministers and leading diplomats. Diplomats, intelligence representatives and experts — among them Oleksandr Khara and Andriy Deshchytsia — told LIGA.net this in comments.

Who returned to the president’s field of view

According to reports, in recent months Zelensky personally met with Dmytro Kuleba and Pavlo Klimkin. The meetings were not public: they concerned strategic approaches to work on the Belarusian direction, interaction with China, India and other non-Western actors.

"The meeting was frank and confidential and covered, among other things, strategic ideas and approaches regarding Ukraine's work on the Belarusian direction, Kyiv's interaction with China, India and the non‑Western world."

— Pavlo Klimkin, former foreign minister

Why it happened now

Experts and interlocutors in intelligence explain: under Yermak’s leadership some information flows to the president were centralized, and the "exes" effectively found themselves outside the field of direct influence. After his dismissal and personnel changes in the Office of the President, communication channels were unblocked.

"Budanov is not a dogmatist and is not guided by President Zelensky's political prospects. That is probably the tenth priority after national security."

— Oleksandr Khara, diplomat and expert at the Center for Defense Strategies

A brief timeline to remember

  • On 28 November 2025 the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP) conducted searches related to Andriy Yermak; on the same day he was dismissed from the post of head of the Office of the President.
  • After his resignation, Yermak regained the right to practice law and in March 2026 headed the committee of the National Association of Lawyers on protecting victims of armed aggression.
  • Currently under consideration is a transformation of the governance architecture in the Office of the President: Zelensky is examining not only personnel candidates but also the model of decision‑making.

What this means for security and foreign policy

Restoring direct contacts with experienced diplomats gives the president several advantages: a broader range of perspectives, faster access to analysis, and the ability to develop alternative approaches to cooperation with countries that were previously viewed with doubt or subject to restrictions. This matters for readers because such changes can affect chosen directions of support, security coordination and economic ties.

What next?

The expert community and intelligence confirm: open channels are not an automatic victory, but a necessary condition for flexible foreign policy. Now decisions will depend on whether consultations can be turned into a systematic decision‑making architecture within the Office of the President and how much Ukraine’s partners see this as a stable signal.

The question that remains: will the new contacts turn into a clear foreign policy strategy backed by institutional changes and concrete steps on the international stage?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026