Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

Ukrainian Armed Forces hit “Kremniy El”, the Afipsky oil refinery and the port “Kavkaz” — a blow to missile infrastructure and supply chains

The General Staff reports overnight strikes on critical facilities in Russia. We explain why this is not merely a tactical strike, but also a mission to reduce the enemy's combat capability.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 14, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukrainian Armed Forces hit “Kremniy El”, the Afipsky oil refinery and the port “Kavkaz” — a blow to missile infrastructure and supply chains
Порт "Кавказ" (Фото: ресурси росіян)

Briefly about the event

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reported night strikes on a number of critical facilities in Russia: the Maykop airfield (Republic of Adygea), the Afipsky oil refinery (Krasnodar Krai), the Kavkaz port in the Chushka area, and the Kremniy El plant in Bryansk. The General Staff's report includes details on the scale of the damage and a forecast for a halt in production.

What was damaged

"Kremniy El", Bryansk: The main production building, where integrated circuits for ballistic, cruise and surface-to-air missiles were manufactured, was hit. A fire broke out over approximately 1,000 square meters, and the roof was destroyed. Warehouse facilities storing components (about 400 m²) were also damaged. According to preliminary estimates, production at the enterprise is suspended for about six months.

Afipsky refinery, Krasnodar Krai: A hit and fire were recorded on the night of March 14. The refinery processes about 6.25 million tonnes of oil per year — roughly 2.1% of Russia's total refining capacity. The refinery and the Kavkaz port are involved in the logistics and supply of fuel for Russian forces.

Kavkaz port (Chushka): Infrastructure was damaged, affecting the ability to receive and dispatch cargo, including fuel and military materiel.

"Striking critical facilities halts the production of components for missiles and complicates the enemy's logistics — these are not random targets, but a consistent effort to reduce their combat capability"

— Representative of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Why this matters

Hitting chip production and component warehouses directly strikes the production chain of Russian missile programs. A strike on the refinery and the port reduces fuel availability to the front and complicates operational logistics. Together these actions have not only a tactical but also an operational-strategic effect: restoring production and infrastructure requires time, resources and secure logistics — all things Russia currently lacks.

Context: previous strikes and confirmations

This is not an isolated episode. Satellite imagery and open-source analyst reports have recorded damage to Russian industrial and missile capabilities: on February 26, satellite images showed damage to a workshop at a rocket factory in Udmurtia, and on March 7 — strikes by ATACMS tactical ballistic missiles and SCALP cruise missiles near Donetsk airport. A series of such strikes indicates a systematic effort to weaken the enemy's key logistical and production hubs.

What next?

The effect of these strikes depends on the enemy's ability to quickly switch production and logistics to reserves. If recovery takes months, this will create a measurable shortage of components and fuel — a direct impact on their operational activity. However, Russia has broad resources and the ability to relocate production, so the key question is how costly and time-consuming that will be for them.

Now the ball is in the partners' court: combining our precision strikes with international pressure on supply chains can turn a temporary tactical advantage into a sustained weakening of the enemy's combat capability. Whether this will be enough is a question for the coming weeks.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026