Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

"180 days at sea: How sanctioned Russian LNG reached China three times"

The Perle tanker spent half a year delivering gas from the sanctioned "Portova" terminal to China — and this is already the third such voyage after the introduction of American sanctions in February 2025.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 19, 2026 · 2 min read

"180 days at sea: How sanctioned Russian LNG reached China three times"
Танкер Perle (Фото: MarineTraffic)

On December 8, 2024, the tanker Perle loaded liquefied natural gas at the Portovaya terminal on the Finnish Gulf. On May 19, 2025, it docked at a Chinese port — 163 days after leaving Russia. According to LSEG Data & Analytics data cited by Reuters, this is a record-long route for this type of cargo between these two points.

What's wrong with Portovaya

The Portovaya terminal serves a similarly named LNG plant owned by Gazprom, which is on U.S. sanctions lists. Washington imposed these restrictions in February 2025 — but already after that Perle voyage, not the first or second cargo from this plant reached China, but the third. This means: sanctions have not yet closed the route, but have only complicated logistics.

Six months at sea is not the norm for LNG transportation. A standard voyage from the Baltic to China takes 25–35 days. Such an extended route suggests either ship-to-ship transshipment somewhere in neutral waters, or prolonged waiting at an intermediary port — a classic sanctions evasion scheme using "shadow fleet" operators.

Why China is buying this gas

China has not joined any sanctions regime against Russia and is openly increasing its imports of Russian LNG. For Beijing, it's a matter of energy security and discounted prices: sanctioned gas is sold at a discount compared to market prices. For Gazprom, it's one of the few sales channels left after losing the European market.

Three deliveries in three months after sanctions were imposed — this is not a coincidence and not an exception, this is an operational model.

The logic of Perle's route

What this means for sanctions pressure

The U.S. could impose secondary sanctions against Chinese companies buying sanctioned LNG — this tool has already been used against the oil sector. But the Biden administration used it cautiously to avoid escalating trade tensions with China. Whether the Trump administration is ready to press here amid parallel negotiations with Beijing — that's an open question.

If by the end of summer 2025 the U.S. does not impose secondary sanctions against specific Chinese buyers of this gas, Portovaya will effectively receive confirmation: American restrictions for it are additional logistics costs, not a business blockade.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026