Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Fire Point and $760M from UAE: AMCU Returns Application, Negotiations Stalled — but Shtiletsky Says the Case Isn't Closed

# Ukrainian News Translation The chief designer and majority owner of the manufacturer of the "Flamingo" missile confirmed at a session of the Verkhovna Rada's temporary special commission his interest in selling 30% of the company to the UAE's EDGE Group defense holding. At the same time, it emerged that the application submitted to the AMCU was returned without review back in January, and a resubmission has not been made.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 25, 2026 · 3 min read

Fire Point and $760M from UAE: AMCU Returns Application, Negotiations Stalled — but Shtiletsky Says the Case Isn't Closed
Денис Штілерман (фото - скриншот з відео)

Denis Shtilerman, chief designer and majority shareholder of Fire Point, who according to his declaration owns 97.5% of the company, appeared before a Temporary Investigative Commission (TIK) of the Verkhovna Rada and confirmed what had been suspected since December: the deal with Arab investors is real. However, its status is far murkier than "under AMCU review."

What Shtilerman confirmed — and what remains unanswered

When TIK members directly asked about the outcome of negotiations with the UAE, Shtilerman replied: "Nothing, this matter is currently under AMCU review." However, this answer contradicts the committee's own official position.

"No repeated application for approval of concentration involving the mentioned business entities has been submitted to the Committee during the current year"

— AMCU response to The Defender Media inquiry

According to AMCU data, an application from EDGE Group — the defense holding of the UAE's sovereign wealth fund — was received on December 30, 2025, and was returned without review on January 14, 2026, due to non-compliance with procedural requirements. No resubmission was made by May.

Meanwhile, Fire Point CEO Iryna Terekh stated in a March interview that the company "added the necessary documents and resubmitted." AMCU denies this.

What the deal is worth and what's at stake

The discussion concerns the sale of 30% of Fire Point for approximately $760 million — which would value the entire company at $2.5 billion. For comparison: at the TIK, Shtilerman also mentioned a higher figure — the refusal of an option worth $5.8 billion, which some deputies called fantastical.

EDGE Group is not merely a private buyer. It is a weapons and drone manufacturer that is part of the UAE's sovereign wealth fund structure. In other words, if the deal had occurred, it would have meant partial state ownership by a foreign country in a key Ukrainian defense enterprise — one that produces the Flamingo cruise missile with a range of up to 3,000 km and a 150 kg warhead, and currently produces three missiles per day.

Context: why the TIK is investigating Fire Point

The TIK, chaired by parliamentarian Oleksiy Honcharenko (European Solidarity faction), is investigating possible violations in the defense sector — specifically alleged connections between the company and sanctioned businessman Timur Mindich. The National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) reported in 2025 that it was investigating Mindich as a probable ultimate beneficial owner of Fire Point. Shtilerman rejected the accusations at the TIK and stated that no criminal cases exist against the company or its management.

Separately, Shtilerman reported that he had renounced Russian citizenship — a matter that arose in connection with the investigation.

  • EDGE Group application submitted to AMCU: December 30, 2025
  • Returned without review: January 14, 2026
  • Resubmitted application (according to CEO Terekh): submitted. But AMCU does not confirm it
  • Shtilerman at TIK: matter "under AMCU review"

The problem runs deeper than procedure

Formally, AMCU acted within regulations — returning documents due to technical non-compliance. But the real issue is different: Ukraine still lacks a legally established system for screening foreign investments in the defense sector. So even if Fire Point eliminates procedural deficiencies, the question of whether a part of a strategic missile manufacturer should belong to a foreign sovereign fund at all will remain open — and no regulator currently has a clear mandate to answer it.

If the Verkhovna Rada does not pass a framework law on foreign investments in the defense-industrial complex by the end of 2026, the next application — from any buyer — will follow the same path: technical return instead of substantive decision.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026