Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

19,000 people in shelling zones: how "100% Life" is building a support system instead of one-time aid

# Comprehensive Assistance Project Concludes in Front-Line Communities of Sumy and Kharkiv Regions A comprehensive assistance project has been completed in front-line communities of Sumy and Kharkiv regions, providing services ranging from mobile psychological support to rehabilitation for children with hearing and visual impairments. The initiative reached 19,000 people who have been living under constant strain for over a decade.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

May 21, 2026 · 2 min read

19,000 people in shelling zones: how "100% Life" is building a support system instead of one-time aid
Над ініціативою БО "100% Життя" працювали 250 фахівців: психологи, соціальні працівники, ментори, мобільні команди, спеціалісти з реабілітації та координатори

A mobile brigade arrives in a community where medical and social services have almost completely disappeared. The people who did not evacuate are mostly elderly, with chronic illnesses, and psychologically exhausted. These are the people that the teams of the NGO "100% Life" traveled to as part of the "From Vulnerability to Strength: Comprehensive Protection Initiative" project.

Why Not "One-Time Aid"

The project was financed through the Humanitarian Fund for Ukraine (UHF/OCHA Ukraine) and was implemented together with partners — the NGO "Ukrainian Smile" and the NGO "City Sustainable Development Agency". Its fundamental difference from typical humanitarian distributions was the integration of various services into one system: psychological support, case management, cash assistance, and rehabilitation — all in one route for a person, rather than separate queues to different organizations.

"People in front-line communities are waiting for someone to come to them. They are in constant exhaustion, stress, uncertainty."

— NGO "100% Life"

"People in front-line communities need not one-time assistance, but the feeling that they are not left alone with their problems."

— Natalia Balayan, project coordinator, NGO "100% Life"

What Was Done

  • Mobile socio-psychological brigades traveled to communities in Sumy and Kharkiv regions — including Bilopolska, Krasnopolska, Yunakivska, Bohodukhivska and others, located directly at the line of contact.
  • Psychological support for children and parents: mental health screening using MHPSS methodology was conducted for 9,448 children — 3,371 in Sumy region, 6,077 in Kharkiv region. According to the results: 143 children (1.6%) have a high level of distress, 2,596 (27.5%) — moderate.
  • Rehabilitation of children with hearing and vision impairments — including the use of game-based methods on tablets to restore vision.
  • Case management and cash assistance for the most vulnerable categories.

Scale and Context

19,000 people received support in total. These are not internally displaced persons in safe cities — these are people who remained or returned to communities where shelling can still be heard. According to OCHA, more than 14.6 million Ukrainians needed humanitarian assistance in 2024. Front-line Sumy and Kharkiv regions are among the most underserved: social infrastructure is destroyed, there is a shortage of specialists, and psychological assistance is still viewed by some residents as "not for me".

It is significant that more than a quarter of the examined children have moderate or high levels of distress — and this is only those who were reached by screening. The actual situation is likely broader.

What's Next

The project is completed. Mobile brigades no longer travel on this route — unless funding is continued. The question is not rhetorical: will any part of the built support system be preserved after the grant cycle ends — or will communities once again be left without specialists until the next project?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026