Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

1,905 buildings left without heat after overnight strike on Kyiv — what the city is doing and what to expect from partners

A nighttime attack damaged a critical infrastructure facility: in several districts of the capital, tens of thousands of people may feel the cold. We examine the scale, the causes, and the measures city authorities and the government are already taking.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 7, 2026 · 2 min read

1,905 buildings left without heat after overnight strike on Kyiv — what the city is doing and what to expect from partners
Ілюстративне фото: depositphotos.com

What happened

In a nighttime strike targeting Kyiv's critical infrastructure, elements of the heating network were damaged — as a result 1,905 buildings in the Pecherskyi, Dniprovskyi, Holosiivskyi and Solomianskyi districts were left without heating. This was reported by Mayor Vitali Klitschko.

"In total, nearly 2,700 buildings in the city are without heat. Including some high-rise apartment buildings in the Darnytskyi and Dniprovskyi districts, to which it is currently impossible to supply the heat carrier because of critical damage to the Darnytska CHPP."

— Vitali Klitschko, mayor of Kyiv

Scale and causal links

The key factor in the situation is the damage to Darnytska CHPP-4, which occurred in winter and, by estimates, will require at least two months to remedy. This CHPP previously supplied heat to over 1,100 buildings in the Darnytskyi and partly the Dniprovskyi districts. Thus the combined effect of the nighttime strike and earlier damage produces the current numbers of outages.

Context: the country's energy situation

Ukraine has been under an energy state of emergency since January 14 due to massive shelling and a sharp cold snap — this greatly complicates the work of emergency crews and makes rapid repairs much harder. The government has already reported agreements to receive decommissioned equipment from six European CHPPs and TPPs — an important decision, but one that requires logistics and time to restore operability.

What authorities are doing and options for residents

City and state authorities are coordinating emergency brigades, assessing possibilities for temporarily connecting alternative heat sources and relocating vulnerable people to designated warming centers. Experts, including the head of the company Yasno, Serhiy Kovalenko (interview with LIGA.net), emphasize: building out local generation and reserve capacity is a matter of security, not just comfort.

What comes next

Repairs to Darnytska CHPP-4 will take at least several weeks, and full system restoration will take longer. This is a test of the responsiveness of municipal services and the reliability of international assistance: agreements on equipment delivery must turn into fast logistics and installation. In the meantime, practical measures are important — mobile boilers, rerouting heat, warming centers and clear communication with residents.

The situation underscores a fundamental challenge: how quickly infrastructure can be made more resilient to repeated strikes and whether mechanisms will be sufficient to protect citizens during the coming cold weeks?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026