Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

$2,537 per meter in a house over 100 years old: why Kiev's "royal" apartments are getting more expensive even during wartime

Pre-revolutionary buildings in Podil and Pechersk are setting price records on Kyiv's secondary real estate market. Logically, it should be the opposite: aging housing stock, no bomb shelters, lack of modern utilities.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 19, 2026 · 2 min read

$2,537 per meter in a house over 100 years old: why Kiev's "royal" apartments are getting more expensive even during wartime
Фото: wikipedia

When the real estate market declines, the first thing that should lose value is the old housing stock without elevators, with wooden ceilings and Soviet pipes. But Kyiv's "royal" buildings, constructed before 1918, do not follow this logic.

How much does a square meter cost in a building older than Ukraine's independence by 6 times

According to analysts at GIS Uvecon, pre-revolutionary buildings lost only 2–3% of their value over a year of war — while panel buildings declined by 12% and budget-class by 7%. Today the situation has become even more dramatic: on Pechersk, a square meter in a "royal" building costs an average of $2,537, while apartments with panoramic views or designer renovations exceed this threshold even further.

Owners of "royal" apartments in the center barely lowered prices — and buyers still found themselves, valuing their location.

GIS Uvecon, secondary market analysis 2024–2025

In parallel, on the primary market, comfort and business-class apartments sell for an average of $2,300–2,700 per meter. That is, a "century-old" building on Podil competes in price with a new business-class residential complex — and doesn't lose.

Three reasons why this is not just nostalgia

  • Limited supply. There are physically few pre-revolutionary buildings in Kyiv, and no new ones will appear. The market is a closed club with a fixed number of places.
  • Location without compromise. Pechersk and Podil are the center where new construction is almost impossible due to protection zones and dense development. Those who want to live in the heart of the city choose between the secondary market and rare new projects at similar prices.
  • Status asset. According to analysts' observations, buyers of "royal" apartments view them not only as housing but as capital preservation — and that's exactly why they don't react to the general market pressure downward.

Context: the general market picture

Currently, there are over 14,000 apartments for sale on Kyiv's secondary market. According to LUN data, the average one-bedroom apartment in the capital costs $65,000, a two-bedroom — $100,000, a three-bedroom — $150,000. The housing affordability index has improved somewhat: buying a one-bedroom apartment now requires 7.5 annual salaries compared to 8 half a year ago.

At the same time, across Ukraine, 48,900 apartments and houses began construction in the first half of 2025 — 35% more than last year. The most active construction is in Kyiv, Lviv, and Ivano-Frankivsk regions. But a new square meter in Holosiyivsky or Darnytsky district and an old square meter on Andriyivsky Descent — these are two different goods for two different buyers.

The security paradox

"Royal" buildings lack underground parking shelters, modern ventilation, and often lack generator connections. Effectively, they lose to new buildings on all wartime criteria. But prices hold steady. This means the buyer of this segment has either solved the security issue differently, or consciously pays for something else — for the feeling of a city that existed before all of this.

If a ceasefire or freezing of the conflict actually happens and part of the 3–4 million Kyivans who left returns to the city — the "royal" square meter on Podil will be the first to feel this demand. The question is whether it will remain affordable even for those who can already afford it today.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026